From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wanlong Gao Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] virtio: change to_vp_device to an inlined definition Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2012 14:10:17 +0800 Message-ID: <50C036C9.4030003@cn.fujitsu.com> References: <1354691009-25966-1-git-send-email-gaowanlong@cn.fujitsu.com> <87y5hcf5ki.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> Reply-To: gaowanlong@cn.fujitsu.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <87y5hcf5ki.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: Rusty Russell Cc: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, mst@redhat.com List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org On 12/06/2012 07:21 AM, Rusty Russell wrote: > Wanlong Gao writes: > >> to_vp_device is worth changing to inlined definition. > > Why? OK, I saw your comments, and I dropped this patch already. Thanks, Wanlong Gao > > Thanks, > Rusty. >