From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Li Zefan Subject: Re: [PATCHSET cgroup/for-3.8] cpuset: decouple cpuset locking from cgroup core Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2012 14:25:03 +0800 Message-ID: <50C03A3F.7070605@huawei.com> References: <1354138460-19286-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> <20121203152205.GB17093@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20121203165338.GF19802@htj.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20121203165338.GF19802-Gd/HAXX7CRxy/B6EtB590w@public.gmane.org> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org To: Tejun Heo Cc: paul-inf54ven1CmVyaH7bEyXVA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Michal Hocko , linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org, hannes-druUgvl0LCNAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org, cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org On 2012/12/4 0:53, Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, Michal. > > On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 04:22:05PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote: >> I have glanced through the series and spotten nothing obviously wrong. I >> do not feel I could give my r-b because I am not familiar with cpusets >> internals enough and some patches looks quite scary (like #8). >> Anyway the resulting outcome seems nice. > > Thanks a lot for looking at it and, yeah, it's a bit scary. Li, Paul, > can you guys please review the series? > We shoudn't haste to target this for 3.8, given that we're in late -rc and Michal felt some patches scary and they hasn't got enough review. I'll squeeze time to review them, but currently I've been backlogged with internal work. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from psmtp.com (na3sys010amx138.postini.com [74.125.245.138]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 183BA6B005D for ; Thu, 6 Dec 2012 01:26:14 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <50C03A3F.7070605@huawei.com> Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2012 14:25:03 +0800 From: Li Zefan MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCHSET cgroup/for-3.8] cpuset: decouple cpuset locking from cgroup core References: <1354138460-19286-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> <20121203152205.GB17093@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20121203165338.GF19802@htj.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <20121203165338.GF19802@htj.dyndns.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Tejun Heo Cc: Michal Hocko , paul@paulmenage.org, glommer@parallels.com, containers@lists.linux-foundation.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, bsingharora@gmail.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org, kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2012/12/4 0:53, Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, Michal. > > On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 04:22:05PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote: >> I have glanced through the series and spotten nothing obviously wrong. I >> do not feel I could give my r-b because I am not familiar with cpusets >> internals enough and some patches looks quite scary (like #8). >> Anyway the resulting outcome seems nice. > > Thanks a lot for looking at it and, yeah, it's a bit scary. Li, Paul, > can you guys please review the series? > We shoudn't haste to target this for 3.8, given that we're in late -rc and Michal felt some patches scary and they hasn't got enough review. I'll squeeze time to review them, but currently I've been backlogged with internal work. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932282Ab2LFGZZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Dec 2012 01:25:25 -0500 Received: from szxga01-in.huawei.com ([119.145.14.64]:40390 "EHLO szxga01-in.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932125Ab2LFGZV (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Dec 2012 01:25:21 -0500 Message-ID: <50C03A3F.7070605@huawei.com> Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2012 14:25:03 +0800 From: Li Zefan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121010 Thunderbird/16.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tejun Heo CC: Michal Hocko , , , , , , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCHSET cgroup/for-3.8] cpuset: decouple cpuset locking from cgroup core References: <1354138460-19286-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> <20121203152205.GB17093@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20121203165338.GF19802@htj.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <20121203165338.GF19802@htj.dyndns.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.135.68.215] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2012/12/4 0:53, Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, Michal. > > On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 04:22:05PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote: >> I have glanced through the series and spotten nothing obviously wrong. I >> do not feel I could give my r-b because I am not familiar with cpusets >> internals enough and some patches looks quite scary (like #8). >> Anyway the resulting outcome seems nice. > > Thanks a lot for looking at it and, yeah, it's a bit scary. Li, Paul, > can you guys please review the series? > We shoudn't haste to target this for 3.8, given that we're in late -rc and Michal felt some patches scary and they hasn't got enough review. I'll squeeze time to review them, but currently I've been backlogged with internal work.