Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/7] target-alpha: Add support for -cpu ?

["Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>]

Am 06.12.2012 16:37, schrieb Eduardo Habkost:
> On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 04:04:00AM +0100, Andreas Färber wrote:
>> Implement alphabetical listing of CPU subclasses.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de>
>> ---
>>  target-alpha/cpu.c |   41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  target-alpha/cpu.h |    4 +++-
>>  2 Dateien geändert, 44 Zeilen hinzugefügt(+), 1 Zeile entfernt(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/target-alpha/cpu.c b/target-alpha/cpu.c
>> index e1a5739..ab25c44 100644
>> --- a/target-alpha/cpu.c
>> +++ b/target-alpha/cpu.c
>> @@ -23,6 +23,47 @@
>>  #include "qemu-common.h"
>>  
>>  
>> +typedef struct AlphaCPUListState {
>> +    fprintf_function cpu_fprintf;
>> +    FILE *file;
>> +} AlphaCPUListState;
>> +
>> +/* Sort alphabetically by type name. */
>> +static gint alpha_cpu_list_compare(gconstpointer a, gconstpointer b)
>> +{
>> +    ObjectClass *class_a = (ObjectClass *)a;
>> +    ObjectClass *class_b = (ObjectClass *)b;
>> +    const char *name_a, *name_b;
>> +
>> +    name_a = object_class_get_name(class_a);
>> +    name_b = object_class_get_name(class_b);
>> +    return strcmp(name_a, name_b);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void alpha_cpu_list_entry(gpointer data, gpointer user_data)
>> +{
>> +    ObjectClass *oc = data;
>> +    AlphaCPUListState *s = user_data;
>> +
>> +    (*s->cpu_fprintf)(s->file, "  %s\n",
>> +                      object_class_get_name(oc));
>> +}
>> +
>> +void alpha_cpu_list(FILE *f, fprintf_function cpu_fprintf)
>> +{
>> +    AlphaCPUListState s = {
>> +        .file = f,
>> +        .cpu_fprintf = cpu_fprintf,
>> +    };
>> +    GSList *list;
>> +
>> +    list = object_class_get_list(TYPE_ALPHA_CPU, false);
>> +    list = g_slist_sort(list, alpha_cpu_list_compare);
>> +    (*cpu_fprintf)(f, "Available CPUs:\n");
>> +    g_slist_foreach(list, alpha_cpu_list_entry, &s);
>> +    g_slist_free(list);
>> +}
> 
> target-arm has very similar code. Isn't it better to first write a
> common reusable function to list CPU models using the list of
> subclasses, instead of adding very similar functions to all
> architectures?

Most ordering functions vary slightly (target-arm for "any"). It would
be possible to generalize the struct and provide a wrapper with type and
callback arguments, but then again some functions add a header line like
here, some don't, and some even hardcode some options like "host". For
the targets that already had -cpu ? support before QOM I tried to keep
output identical apart from possibly the order.

Andreas

-- 
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg