From: Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com>
To: Alex Shi <lkml.alex@gmail.com>
Cc: npiggin@kernel.dk, mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Preeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Van De Ven, Arjan" <arjan.van.de.ven@intel.com>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] sched: fork/exec/wake clean up
Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2012 08:33:36 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50C13960.5010901@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGjg+kE9dFSfnridN_5ngtuC1r5rbnkLVfyqkdTwWCE0LOG4OQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 12/05/2012 03:09 PM, Alex Shi wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 9:54 PM, Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com> wrote:
>> This patchset try to clean up select_task_rq_fair which used for
>> fork/exec/wake scheduling.
>>
>> With this patchset, our system NHM EX and SNB EP 4 socket machine
>> has 10% hackbench performance increase.
>
> Any comments for this patchset?
Nick & Ingo:
Would you like to give some comments for this?
CC to more experts :)
Thanks!
Alex
>>
>> Regards
>> Alex
>>
>> [PATCH 01/4] sched: select_task_rq_fair clean up
>> [PATCH 02/4] sched: fix find_idlest_group mess logical
>> [PATCH 03/4] sched: don't need go to smaller sched domain
>> [PATCH 04/4] sched: remove domain iterations in fork/exec/wake
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-12-07 0:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-03 13:54 [PATCH 0/4] sched: fork/exec/wake clean up Alex Shi
2012-12-03 13:54 ` [PATCH 01/10] sched: select_task_rq_fair " Alex Shi
2012-12-06 17:50 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-12-07 0:31 ` Alex Shi
2012-12-07 1:02 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-12-07 1:22 ` Alex Shi
2012-12-03 13:54 ` [PATCH 02/10] sched: fix find_idlest_group mess logical Alex Shi
2012-12-07 0:56 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-12-07 1:32 ` Alex Shi
2012-12-07 8:33 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-12-08 12:12 ` Alex Shi
2012-12-03 13:54 ` [PATCH 03/10] sched: don't need go to smaller sched domain Alex Shi
2012-12-03 13:54 ` [PATCH 04/10] sched: remove domain iterations in fork/exec/wake Alex Shi
2012-12-05 7:09 ` [PATCH 0/4] sched: fork/exec/wake clean up Alex Shi
2012-12-07 0:33 ` Alex Shi [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50C13960.5010901@intel.com \
--to=alex.shi@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arjan.van.de.ven@intel.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkml.alex@gmail.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=npiggin@kernel.dk \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.