From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/5] KVM: MMU: move adjusting pte access for softmmu to FNAME(page_fault)
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 17:12:20 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50C5A774.1050601@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50C5A747.1020105@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Then, no mmu specified code exists in the common function and drop two
parameters in set_spte
Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c | 47 ++++++++++++-------------------------------
arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h | 25 ++++++++++++++++++----
2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
index 01d7c2a..2a3c890 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
@@ -2342,8 +2342,7 @@ static int mmu_need_write_protect(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gfn_t gfn,
}
static int set_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *sptep,
- unsigned pte_access, int user_fault,
- int write_fault, int level,
+ unsigned pte_access, int level,
gfn_t gfn, pfn_t pfn, bool speculative,
bool can_unsync, bool host_writable)
{
@@ -2378,9 +2377,7 @@ static int set_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *sptep,
spte |= (u64)pfn << PAGE_SHIFT;
- if ((pte_access & ACC_WRITE_MASK)
- || (!vcpu->arch.mmu.direct_map && write_fault
- && !is_write_protection(vcpu) && !user_fault)) {
+ if (pte_access & ACC_WRITE_MASK) {
/*
* There are two cases:
@@ -2399,19 +2396,6 @@ static int set_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *sptep,
spte |= PT_WRITABLE_MASK | SPTE_MMU_WRITEABLE;
- if (!vcpu->arch.mmu.direct_map
- && !(pte_access & ACC_WRITE_MASK)) {
- spte &= ~PT_USER_MASK;
- /*
- * If we converted a user page to a kernel page,
- * so that the kernel can write to it when cr0.wp=0,
- * then we should prevent the kernel from executing it
- * if SMEP is enabled.
- */
- if (kvm_read_cr4_bits(vcpu, X86_CR4_SMEP))
- spte |= PT64_NX_MASK;
- }
-
/*
* Optimization: for pte sync, if spte was writable the hash
* lookup is unnecessary (and expensive). Write protection
@@ -2442,18 +2426,15 @@ done:
static void mmu_set_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *sptep,
unsigned pt_access, unsigned pte_access,
- int user_fault, int write_fault,
- int *emulate, int level, gfn_t gfn,
- pfn_t pfn, bool speculative,
- bool host_writable)
+ int write_fault, int *emulate, int level, gfn_t gfn,
+ pfn_t pfn, bool speculative, bool host_writable)
{
int was_rmapped = 0;
int rmap_count;
- pgprintk("%s: spte %llx access %x write_fault %d"
- " user_fault %d gfn %llx\n",
+ pgprintk("%s: spte %llx access %x write_fault %d gfn %llx\n",
__func__, *sptep, pt_access,
- write_fault, user_fault, gfn);
+ write_fault, gfn);
if (is_rmap_spte(*sptep)) {
/*
@@ -2477,9 +2458,8 @@ static void mmu_set_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *sptep,
was_rmapped = 1;
}
- if (set_spte(vcpu, sptep, pte_access, user_fault, write_fault,
- level, gfn, pfn, speculative, true,
- host_writable)) {
+ if (set_spte(vcpu, sptep, pte_access, level, gfn, pfn, speculative,
+ true, host_writable)) {
if (write_fault)
*emulate = 1;
kvm_mmu_flush_tlb(vcpu);
@@ -2571,10 +2551,9 @@ static int direct_pte_prefetch_many(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
return -1;
for (i = 0; i < ret; i++, gfn++, start++)
- mmu_set_spte(vcpu, start, ACC_ALL,
- access, 0, 0, NULL,
- sp->role.level, gfn,
- page_to_pfn(pages[i]), true, true);
+ mmu_set_spte(vcpu, start, ACC_ALL, access, 0, NULL,
+ sp->role.level, gfn, page_to_pfn(pages[i]),
+ true, true);
return 0;
}
@@ -2636,8 +2615,8 @@ static int __direct_map(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t v, int write,
unsigned pte_access = ACC_ALL;
mmu_set_spte(vcpu, iterator.sptep, ACC_ALL, pte_access,
- 0, write, &emulate,
- level, gfn, pfn, prefault, map_writable);
+ write, &emulate, level, gfn, pfn,
+ prefault, map_writable);
direct_pte_prefetch(vcpu, iterator.sptep);
++vcpu->stat.pf_fixed;
break;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h b/arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h
index 891eb6d..ec481e9 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h
@@ -330,7 +330,7 @@ FNAME(prefetch_gpte)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp,
* we call mmu_set_spte() with host_writable = true because
* pte_prefetch_gfn_to_pfn always gets a writable pfn.
*/
- mmu_set_spte(vcpu, spte, sp->role.access, pte_access, 0, 0,
+ mmu_set_spte(vcpu, spte, sp->role.access, pte_access, 0,
NULL, PT_PAGE_TABLE_LEVEL, gfn, pfn, true, true);
return true;
@@ -405,7 +405,7 @@ static void FNAME(pte_prefetch)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct guest_walker *gw,
*/
static int FNAME(fetch)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t addr,
struct guest_walker *gw,
- int user_fault, int write_fault, int hlevel,
+ int write_fault, int hlevel,
pfn_t pfn, bool map_writable, bool prefault)
{
struct kvm_mmu_page *sp = NULL;
@@ -478,7 +478,7 @@ static int FNAME(fetch)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t addr,
clear_sp_write_flooding_count(it.sptep);
mmu_set_spte(vcpu, it.sptep, access, gw->pte_access,
- user_fault, write_fault, &emulate, it.level,
+ write_fault, &emulate, it.level,
gw->gfn, pfn, prefault, map_writable);
FNAME(pte_prefetch)(vcpu, gw, it.sptep);
@@ -544,6 +544,21 @@ static int FNAME(page_fault)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t addr, u32 error_code,
return 0;
}
+ if (write_fault && !(walker.pte_access & ACC_WRITE_MASK) &&
+ !is_write_protection(vcpu) && !user_fault) {
+ walker.pte_access |= ACC_WRITE_MASK;
+ walker.pte_access &= ~ACC_USER_MASK;
+
+ /*
+ * If we converted a user page to a kernel page,
+ * so that the kernel can write to it when cr0.wp=0,
+ * then we should prevent the kernel from executing it
+ * if SMEP is enabled.
+ */
+ if (kvm_read_cr4_bits(vcpu, X86_CR4_SMEP))
+ walker.pte_access &= ~ACC_EXEC_MASK;
+ }
+
if (walker.level >= PT_DIRECTORY_LEVEL)
force_pt_level = mapping_level_dirty_bitmap(vcpu, walker.gfn);
else
@@ -572,7 +587,7 @@ static int FNAME(page_fault)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t addr, u32 error_code,
kvm_mmu_free_some_pages(vcpu);
if (!force_pt_level)
transparent_hugepage_adjust(vcpu, &walker.gfn, &pfn, &level);
- r = FNAME(fetch)(vcpu, addr, &walker, user_fault, write_fault,
+ r = FNAME(fetch)(vcpu, addr, &walker, write_fault,
level, pfn, map_writable, prefault);
++vcpu->stat.pf_fixed;
kvm_mmu_audit(vcpu, AUDIT_POST_PAGE_FAULT);
@@ -747,7 +762,7 @@ static int FNAME(sync_page)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
host_writable = sp->spt[i] & SPTE_HOST_WRITEABLE;
- set_spte(vcpu, &sp->spt[i], pte_access, 0, 0,
+ set_spte(vcpu, &sp->spt[i], pte_access,
PT_PAGE_TABLE_LEVEL, gfn,
spte_to_pfn(sp->spt[i]), true, false,
host_writable);
--
1.7.7.6
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-12-10 9:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-10 9:11 [PATCH v2 0/5] KVM: x86: improve reexecute_instruction Xiao Guangrong
2012-12-10 9:12 ` Xiao Guangrong [this message]
2012-12-11 23:47 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] KVM: MMU: move adjusting pte access for softmmu to FNAME(page_fault) Marcelo Tosatti
2012-12-12 18:53 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-12-10 9:13 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] KVM: MMU: adjust page size early if gfn used as page table Xiao Guangrong
2012-12-12 0:57 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-12-12 19:23 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-12-13 22:37 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-12-10 9:13 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] KVM: x86: clean up reexecute_instruction Xiao Guangrong
2012-12-10 9:14 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] KVM: x86: let reexecute_instruction work for tdp Xiao Guangrong
2012-12-10 9:14 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] KVM: x86: improve reexecute_instruction Xiao Guangrong
2012-12-12 1:09 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-12-12 19:29 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-12-13 23:02 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-12-14 3:40 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-12-11 23:36 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] " Marcelo Tosatti
2012-12-12 20:05 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-12-13 22:54 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-12-14 4:50 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-12-15 1:05 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-12-23 11:46 ` Gleb Natapov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50C5A774.1050601@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=gleb@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.