From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Warren Subject: Re: NVIDIA Tegra DDX Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 09:55:09 -0700 Message-ID: <50C613ED.4070401@wwwdotorg.org> References: <20121210105627.GA7503@avionic-0098.adnet.avionic-design.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20121210105627.GA7503-RM9K5IK7kjIyiCvfTdI0JKcOhU4Rzj621B7CTYaBSLdn68oJJulU0Q@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-tegra-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Thierry Reding Cc: xorg-devel-go0+a7rfsptAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org, linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org On 12/10/2012 03:56 AM, Thierry Reding wrote: ... > Aaron had some reservations about calling this xf86-video-tegra > because it will clash with the binary tegra_drv.so provided by > NVIDIA. However I couldn't come up with anything more creative. > Distributions will have to deal with this in some way or another > anyway and there really isn't a way of running both drivers on top > of the same kernel currently, so I decided not to care. Why not xf86-video-tegradrm, since tegradrm is the kernel driver it talks to. It'd also help make it more obvious which user-space driver to pick based on the kernel driver.