From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joao Eduardo Luis Subject: Re: Few questions about Ceph Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 22:01:17 +0000 Message-ID: <50C65BAD.8090608@inktank.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from mail-ea0-f174.google.com ([209.85.215.174]:49239 "EHLO mail-ea0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751474Ab2LJWB3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Dec 2012 17:01:29 -0500 Received: by mail-ea0-f174.google.com with SMTP id e13so1267314eaa.19 for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 14:01:28 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: =?UTF-8?B?QWxleGFuZHJlIE1hdW1lbsOp?= Cc: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org On 12/10/2012 07:17 PM, Alexandre Maumen=C3=A9 wrote: > Hello all, > > I have a few questions about Ceph: > > 1) Is it possible to run a cluster with "some" lantecy between monito= r > nodes? Latency will be 30ms at worst. =46or the monitor, yes, that latency is acceptable. In between them, th= e=20 monitors are pretty permissive with the timeouts they establish, so 30m= s=20 should be okay. If it goes much higher than that however, you may start= =20 noticing some clock drifting related messages. Anyway, you should be fi= ne. -Joao -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html