From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from list by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.71) id 1TiEYr-0001MQ-Lv for mharc-qemu-trivial@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 20:23:05 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:48400) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TiEYm-0001MA-KJ for qemu-trivial@nongnu.org; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 20:23:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TiEYk-0004E3-9q for qemu-trivial@nongnu.org; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 20:23:00 -0500 Received: from furnace.wzff.de ([2a01:4f8:150:63e2::9]:51690) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TiEYk-0004Dz-38; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 20:22:58 -0500 Received: from xdsl-188-155-204-150.adslplus.ch ([188.155.204.150] helo=[10.1.1.4]) by furnace.wzff.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.80.1 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1TiEYf-0002wE-L1; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 02:22:55 +0100 Message-ID: <50C68B04.9020902@barfooze.de> Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 02:23:16 +0100 From: John Spencer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.14) Gecko/20110221 SUSE/3.1.8 Mail/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stefan Weil References: <1355122786-29243-1-git-send-email-maillist-qemu@barfooze.de> <1355122786-29243-3-git-send-email-maillist-qemu@barfooze.de> <50C6209F.8060506@weilnetz.de> In-Reply-To: <50C6209F.8060506@weilnetz.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a01:4f8:150:63e2::9 Cc: qemu-trivial@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org Subject: Re: [Qemu-trivial] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/4] fix implicit declaration of syscall() in linux-user/syscall.c X-BeenThere: qemu-trivial@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 01:23:04 -0000 On 12/10/2012 06:49 PM, Stefan Weil wrote: > Am 10.12.2012 07:59, schrieb John Spencer: >> +#include > > This is a workaround for a missing declaration of function syscall > in musl's unistd.h. See my comment to patch 1 for more information. > thanks for noticing! fixed in musl: http://git.musl-libc.org/cgit/musl/commit/?id=baf246e559e915a78a9703e10d15020c7edee423 how do we proceed with the 2 good patches ? is there anything i have to do to get them merged, now that you put the "Reviewed-by" stamp on them ? Thanks, John Spencer From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:48419) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TiEYt-0001OM-5z for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 20:23:10 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TiEYq-0004Eh-6B for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 20:23:07 -0500 Message-ID: <50C68B04.9020902@barfooze.de> Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 02:23:16 +0100 From: John Spencer MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1355122786-29243-1-git-send-email-maillist-qemu@barfooze.de> <1355122786-29243-3-git-send-email-maillist-qemu@barfooze.de> <50C6209F.8060506@weilnetz.de> In-Reply-To: <50C6209F.8060506@weilnetz.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/4] fix implicit declaration of syscall() in linux-user/syscall.c List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Stefan Weil Cc: qemu-trivial@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 12/10/2012 06:49 PM, Stefan Weil wrote: > Am 10.12.2012 07:59, schrieb John Spencer: >> +#include > > This is a workaround for a missing declaration of function syscall > in musl's unistd.h. See my comment to patch 1 for more information. > thanks for noticing! fixed in musl: http://git.musl-libc.org/cgit/musl/commit/?id=baf246e559e915a78a9703e10d15020c7edee423 how do we proceed with the 2 good patches ? is there anything i have to do to get them merged, now that you put the "Reviewed-by" stamp on them ? Thanks, John Spencer