Re: [meta-fsl-arm-extra][PATCH 0/3] Initial support for Nitrogen6X

[Eric Nelson <eric.nelson@boundarydevices.com>]

Hi Otavio,

On 12/11/2012 07:35 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Eric Nelson <
> eric.nelson@boundarydevices.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 12/11/2012 07:10 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>>> On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 1:58 AM, Eric Nelson <
>>> eric.nelson@boundarydevices.**com <eric.nelson@boundarydevices.com>>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>> The sdcard generation routine works this way and I'd like to do minimal
>>> changes on this, if possible. Currently the change I am doing is to have
>>> the boot script in the first partition. Maybe we'd need to patch the boot
>>> script to be able to load kernel and pass the right root param, but rest
>>> should work fine.
>>>
>> I have no problem building 6x_bootscript_yocto and adding it to our git
>> repository. I think this will require a bump in the revision.
>>
>> Do you want to keep uImage in the root of the first partition, and
>> format that as FAT?
>>
> At least for now. I'd like to keep the change at minimum. We can refactor
> and improve it later.
>

Do you know the context (directory) in which the patch will be applied?

Will it be from the root of the U-Boot tree and patch
	board/boundary/nitrogen6x/6x_bootscript.txt
	board/boundary/nitrogen6x/6x_upgrade.txt

Or will it be applied somewhere in the work directory?

Also, the 6x_upgrade script is useless unless we copy u-boot.imx
into one of the partitions. Should it go into the FAT partition or
the ext3 partition?

Please advise,


Eric