From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from psmtp.com (na3sys010amx160.postini.com [74.125.245.160]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D65976B0074 for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 16:56:27 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 22:56:22 +0100 From: Zlatko Calusic MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20121203194208.GZ24381@cmpxchg.org> <20121204214210.GB20253@cmpxchg.org> <20121205030133.GA17438@wolff.to> <20121206173742.GA27297@wolff.to> <50C32D32.6040800@iskon.hr> <50C3AF80.8040700@iskon.hr> <20121210110337.GH1009@suse.de> <20121210163904.GA22101@cmpxchg.org> <20121210180141.GK1009@suse.de> <50C62AE6.3030000@iskon.hr> <50C6477A.4090005@iskon.hr> <50C67C13.6090702@iskon.hr> In-Reply-To: <50C67C13.6090702@iskon.hr> Message-ID: <50C7AC06.8030502@iskon.hr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: kswapd craziness in 3.7 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Andrew Morton , Mel Gorman , Johannes Weiner , Rik van Riel , linux-mm , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Hugh Dickins On 11.12.2012 01:19, Zlatko Calusic wrote: > > I will now make one last attempt, I've just reverted 2 Johannes' commits > that were also applied in attempt to fix breakage that removing > gfp_no_kswapd introduced, namely ed23ec4 & c702418. For various reasons > the results of this test will be available tommorow, so it's your call > Linus. > To be honest, I don't see any difference with those two commits reverted. Like those lines never did much anyway, so it's probably good we got rid of them. :P -- Zlatko -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754828Ab2LKV4a (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Dec 2012 16:56:30 -0500 Received: from mxout2.iskon.hr ([213.191.128.81]:34084 "EHLO mxout2.iskon.hr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754736Ab2LKV41 (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Dec 2012 16:56:27 -0500 X-Remote-IP: 213.191.128.133 Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 22:56:22 +0100 From: Zlatko Calusic Organization: Iskon Internet d.d. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Icedove/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Linus Torvalds CC: Andrew Morton , Mel Gorman , Johannes Weiner , Rik van Riel , linux-mm , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Hugh Dickins References: <20121203194208.GZ24381@cmpxchg.org> <20121204214210.GB20253@cmpxchg.org> <20121205030133.GA17438@wolff.to> <20121206173742.GA27297@wolff.to> <50C32D32.6040800@iskon.hr> <50C3AF80.8040700@iskon.hr> <20121210110337.GH1009@suse.de> <20121210163904.GA22101@cmpxchg.org> <20121210180141.GK1009@suse.de> <50C62AE6.3030000@iskon.hr> <50C6477A.4090005@iskon.hr> <50C67C13.6090702@iskon.hr> In-Reply-To: <50C67C13.6090702@iskon.hr> Message-ID: <50C7AC06.8030502@iskon.hr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: kswapd craziness in 3.7 X-Anti-Virus: Kaspersky Anti-Virus for Linux Mail Server 5.6.45/RELEASE, bases: 20121211 #8687632, check: 20121211 clean X-SpamTest-Envelope-From: zlatko.calusic@iskon.hr X-SpamTest-Group-ID: 00000000 X-SpamTest-Info: Profiles 40165 [Dec 12 2012] X-SpamTest-Method: none X-SpamTest-Rate: 0 X-SpamTest-SPF: none X-SpamTest-Status: Not detected X-SpamTest-Status-Extended: not_detected X-SpamTest-Version: SMTP-Filter Version 3.0.0 [0284], KAS30/Release Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 11.12.2012 01:19, Zlatko Calusic wrote: > > I will now make one last attempt, I've just reverted 2 Johannes' commits > that were also applied in attempt to fix breakage that removing > gfp_no_kswapd introduced, namely ed23ec4 & c702418. For various reasons > the results of this test will be available tommorow, so it's your call > Linus. > To be honest, I don't see any difference with those two commits reverted. Like those lines never did much anyway, so it's probably good we got rid of them. :P -- Zlatko