From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.windriver.com ([147.11.1.11]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Tibx0-0001fF-Ei for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 03:21:34 +0100 Received: from ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-hca.corp.ad.wrs.com [147.11.189.40]) by mail.windriver.com (8.14.5/8.14.3) with ESMTP id qBC26xMH010648 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 11 Dec 2012 18:06:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from [128.224.163.154] (128.224.163.154) by ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (147.11.189.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.318.4; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 18:06:59 -0800 Message-ID: <50C7E6CB.50002@windriver.com> Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 10:07:07 +0800 From: ChenQi User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120410 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Constantin Musca References: <5078335c2652b28a2613b3395cd95665675c1626.1355236839.git.constantinx.musca@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <5078335c2652b28a2613b3395cd95665675c1626.1355236839.git.constantinx.musca@intel.com> X-Originating-IP: [128.224.163.154] Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] alsa-utils: Pass udev-rules-dir as parameter X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 02:21:34 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 12/11/2012 11:29 PM, Constantin Musca wrote: > Fix the following warning: > WARNING: QA Issue: alsa-utils: Files/directories were installed but not shipped > /lib > /lib/udev > /lib/udev/rules.d > /lib/udev/rules.d/90-alsa-restore.rules > > [YOCTO #3440] > > Signed-off-by: Constantin Musca > --- > meta/recipes-multimedia/alsa/alsa-utils_1.0.25.bb | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/meta/recipes-multimedia/alsa/alsa-utils_1.0.25.bb b/meta/recipes-multimedia/alsa/alsa-utils_1.0.25.bb > index 597e8b6..8f28a48 100644 > --- a/meta/recipes-multimedia/alsa/alsa-utils_1.0.25.bb > +++ b/meta/recipes-multimedia/alsa/alsa-utils_1.0.25.bb > @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ LICENSE = "GPLv2+" > LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=59530bdf33659b29e73d4adb9f9f6552 \ > file://alsactl/utils.c;beginline=1;endline=20;md5=fe9526b055e246b5558809a5ae25c0b9" > DEPENDS = "alsa-lib ncurses libsamplerate0" > -PR = "r2" > +PR = "r3" > > SRC_URI = "ftp://ftp.alsa-project.org/pub/utils/alsa-utils-${PV}.tar.bz2 \ > file://ncursesfix.patch \ > @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "2e676a2f634bbfe279b260e10a96f617cb72ee63c5bbf6c5f96bb61570 > # http://bugs.openembedded.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2348 > # please close bug and remove this comment when properly fixed > # > -EXTRA_OECONF = "--disable-xmlto" > +EXTRA_OECONF = "--disable-xmlto --with-udev-rules-dir=${base_libdir}/udev/rules.d" > EXTRA_OECONF_append_libc-uclibc = " --disable-nls" > > inherit autotools gettext Hi Musca, Another bug is related to the udev rules directory. It's similar to this one. https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2804 (You could also use 'udev' to filter the message in oe-core list to see the previous discussions on this topic.) It seems alsa-utils does not seem to be the only package that hardcodes its udev-rules-dir. Besides, udev cannot start properly if installed under /lib64. #!/bin/sh ### BEGIN INIT INFO # Provides: udev # Required-Start: mountvirtfs # Required-Stop: # Default-Start: S # Default-Stop: # Short-Description: Start udevd, populate /dev and load drivers. ### END INIT INFO export TZ=/etc/localtime [ -d /sys/class ] || exit 1 [ -r /proc/mounts ] || exit 1 [ -x /lib/udev/udevd ] || exit 1 [ -f /etc/default/udev-cache ] && . /etc/default/udev-cache [ -f /etc/udev/udev.conf ] && . /etc/udev/udev.conf The question here is: Whether we should always install udev under /lib or patch all packages that hardcodes udev-rules-dir to be under '/lib'. Maybe there are other better approaches? Please have a look at these and let me know your opinions. Thanks a lot, Chen Qi