From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.chez-thomas.org (mail.mlbassoc.com [65.100.170.105]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC41EE00294 for ; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 15:34:26 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail.chez-thomas.org (Postfix, from userid 1998) id 9E156F8124E; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 16:34:26 -0700 (MST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on hermes.chez-thomas.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,FREEMAIL_FROM,NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED autolearn=no version=3.3.2 Received: from [192.168.1.114] (zeus [192.168.1.114]) by mail.chez-thomas.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D456CF81221; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 16:34:17 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: <50CA6611.2020009@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 16:34:41 -0700 From: Gary Thomas User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrei Gherzan References: <1355437865-3273-1-git-send-email-andrei.gherzan@windriver.com> <50CA5C74.6020304@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Cc: "meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] mesa-dri: Sync with version from oe-core X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 23:34:27 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 2012-12-13 16:25, Andrei Gherzan wrote: > On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 12:53 AM, Gary Thomas > wrote: > > On 2012-12-13 15:31, Andrei Gherzan wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Andrei Gherzan > > > > Note: you should prefix your subject with [meta-fsl-arm] so it's > obvious which repository these are against (see the README) > > Well readme said: > git send-email --to meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org --subject-prefix='meta-fsl-arm][PATCH' > > You're right. > > Also, shouldn't most of these have ended up as renames (-M)? > > Again you are right. Thanks. n.b. I'm not trying to be picky, just making it easier for the rest of us to review the changes :-)