From: Ang Way Chuang <wcang@sfc.wide.ad.jp>
To: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [Bridge] [PATCH] bridge: Bug fix for incorrect interpretation of MLDv2 maximum response code
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 08:35:21 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50CA7449.8000305@sfc.wide.ad.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121213162346.71c3779f@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net>
On 14/12/2012 08:23, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Dec 2012 08:19:04 +0800
> Ang Way Chuang <wcang@sfc.wide.ad.jp> wrote:
>
>> On 14/12/2012 08:12, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>>> On Fri, 14 Dec 2012 08:07:01 +0800
>>> Ang Way Chuang <wcang@sfc.wide.ad.jp> wrote:
>>>
>>>> This patch fixes the incorrect interpretation of endianness of MLDv2 maximum response
>>>> code within bridge's multicast snooping code.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Ang Way Chuang <wcang@sfc.wide.ad.jp>
>>>> ---
>>>> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_multicast.c b/net/bridge/br_multicast.c
>>>> index 977c3ee..29c6283 100644
>>>> --- a/net/bridge/br_multicast.c
>>>> +++ b/net/bridge/br_multicast.c
>>>> @@ -1172,7 +1172,7 @@ static int br_ip6_multicast_query(struct net_bridge *br,
>>>> mld2q = (struct mld2_query *)icmp6_hdr(skb);
>>>> if (!mld2q->mld2q_nsrcs)
>>>> group = &mld2q->mld2q_mca;
>>>> - max_delay = mld2q->mld2q_mrc ? MLDV2_MRC(mld2q->mld2q_mrc) : 1;
>>>> + max_delay = mld2q->mld2q_mrc ? MLDV2_MRC(ntohs(mld2q->mld2q_mrc)) : 1;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> if (!group)
>>> Already fixed as part of my patch to fix sparse warnings.
>>> --
>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
>>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>>
>> aye, aye.
> Yours looks cleaner (I added a temp variable). You might want to submit
> patch to switch to your oneline version.
>
Well, the patch did get into the netdev mailing list. I think your direct reply arrived in my mailbox first before I received my own patch through netdev. By the way, I don't see your patch on net-next git. Otherwise, I wouldn't have gone through the trouble of debugging and testing it on my computer. Is there any other repo that I should watch out to avoid this kind of silly situation in the future?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-12-14 0:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-14 0:07 [Bridge] [PATCH] bridge: Bug fix for incorrect interpretation of MLDv2 maximum response code Ang Way Chuang
2012-12-14 0:12 ` Stephen Hemminger
2012-12-14 0:19 ` Ang Way Chuang
2012-12-14 0:23 ` Stephen Hemminger
2012-12-14 0:35 ` Ang Way Chuang [this message]
2012-12-14 0:51 ` Stephen Hemminger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50CA7449.8000305@sfc.wide.ad.jp \
--to=wcang@sfc.wide.ad.jp \
--cc=bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shemminger@vyatta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.