From: James Page <james.page@ubuntu.com>
To: Gary Lowell <gary.lowell@inktank.com>
Cc: Sage Weil <sage@inktank.com>, Wido den Hollander <wido@widodh.nl>,
ceph-devel <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Debian packaging question
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 09:03:47 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50CAEB73.2070601@ubuntu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3EBEC3BA-3E32-413E-8DBF-5ED7A5FB6F36@inktank.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
On 14/12/12 04:38, Gary Lowell wrote:
>> I think that the "--debbuildopts '-j8 -b'" might be trouncing
>> the
>>> - --binary-arch flag - I'll get pbuilder setup and give it a
>>> test - I normally use sbuild (for which the packaging changes
>>> did have the desired effect).
>
> I does appear to have been the --debbuildopts causing the problem.
> The combination of your rules file update and removing
> --debbuildopts built just the arch dependent packages.
Good - I'd not managed to actually test this out (I was struggling
with pbuilder).
> Thanks for the help.
No problem
Cheers
James
- --
James Page
Ubuntu Core Developer
Debian Maintainer
james.page@ubuntu.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/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=oil3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-12-14 9:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-11 5:19 Debian packaging question Gary Lowell
2012-12-11 5:34 ` Wido den Hollander
2012-12-11 6:32 ` Gary Lowell
2012-12-11 10:06 ` James Page
2012-12-11 23:00 ` Gary Lowell
2012-12-12 11:04 ` James Page
2012-12-12 15:44 ` Sage Weil
2012-12-12 21:12 ` James Page
2012-12-12 22:17 ` James Page
2012-12-12 23:38 ` Gary Lowell
2012-12-13 9:09 ` James Page
2012-12-14 4:38 ` Gary Lowell
2012-12-14 9:03 ` James Page [this message]
2012-12-11 5:34 ` Sage Weil
2012-12-11 6:38 ` Gary Lowell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50CAEB73.2070601@ubuntu.com \
--to=james.page@ubuntu.com \
--cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gary.lowell@inktank.com \
--cc=sage@inktank.com \
--cc=wido@widodh.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.