From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from am1outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (am1ehsobe006.messaging.microsoft.com [213.199.154.209]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1E84E01404 for ; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 04:54:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail98-am1-R.bigfish.com (10.3.201.227) by AM1EHSOBE006.bigfish.com (10.3.204.26) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.23; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 12:54:32 +0000 Received: from mail98-am1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail98-am1-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24674C0420; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 12:54:32 +0000 (UTC) X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:70.37.183.190; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); IPV:NLI; H:mail.freescale.net; RD:none; EFVD:NLI X-SpamScore: -6 X-BigFish: VS-6(zzbb2dI98dI9371I1dbaI1432I1447Izz1de0h1202h1e76h1d1ah1d2ahzz8275bhz2dh2a8h668h839h947hd25he5bhf0ah1288h12a5h12a9h12bdh137ah13b6h1441h1504h1537h153bh162dh1631h1758h1765h1155h) Received: from mail98-am1 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail98-am1 (MessageSwitch) id 1355489669743409_28307; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 12:54:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from AM1EHSMHS010.bigfish.com (unknown [10.3.201.243]) by mail98-am1.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B33642A0052; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 12:54:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.freescale.net (70.37.183.190) by AM1EHSMHS010.bigfish.com (10.3.207.110) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.225.23; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 12:54:28 +0000 Received: from az84smr01.freescale.net (10.64.34.197) by 039-SN1MMR1-004.039d.mgd.msft.net (10.84.1.14) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.318.3; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 12:54:26 +0000 Received: from [10.29.244.61] ([10.29.244.61]) by az84smr01.freescale.net (8.14.3/8.14.0) with ESMTP id qBECsOje015050; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 05:54:25 -0700 Message-ID: <50CB21F7.7070100@freescale.com> Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 10:56:23 -0200 From: Daiane Angolini User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Otavio Salvador References: <1355486234-7035-1-git-send-email-andrei.gherzan@windriver.com> <50CB1D5B.10309@freescale.com> In-Reply-To: X-OriginatorOrg: freescale.com Cc: "meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Re: [meta-fsl-arm][PATCH 1/3] u-boot: Rename recipe to u-boot-fsl X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 12:54:34 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 12/14/2012 10:41 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote: > On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Daiane Angolini > wrote: >> On 12/14/2012 10:00 AM, Andrei Gherzan wrote: >>> >>> Hey, >>> >>> Can we have these 3 patches series merged in danny too? >> >> Thanks for the patches. I haven't figured it before and it really makes >> sense. >> >> Could you, please, send V2 using another name for recipe? > > Daiane, > > Maybe the name choosen by Andrei could be kept. Let me explain ... > > The point here is to avoid collision in namespace so the risk of > someone providing u-boot-mainline in a BSP or internal layer is higher > than u-boot-fsl and while this code is based on mainline code it has > some patches specific for us (like the environment changes for OE). > > What do you think? I don't agree u-boot-fsl is a good/clear name. But it's only a matter of naming. Anything else would be good. Let me explain: currently we have: 1) u-boot from mainline plus some imx patches 2) u-boot from freescale (2009.08 - it's called u-boot-imx) If there is any u-boot to be called FSL it would be the one provided by FSL. So, I would propose 1) u-boot from mainline plus some imx patches = u-boot-imx 2) u-boot from freescale (2009.08) = u-boot-fsl Or, in case you want to keep u-boot-imx as is, you can choose any other word to determinate 1), somethink like: 1) u-boot from mainline plus some imx patches = u-boot-github 2) u-boot from freescale (2009.08) = u-boot-imx Daiane