From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:52304)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pl@dlhnet.de>) id 1TjZmD-0000z2-6x
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 13:14:27 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pl@dlhnet.de>) id 1TjZmA-0001M6-7J
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 13:14:25 -0500
Received: from ssl.dlhnet.de ([91.198.192.8]:46448 helo=ssl.dlh.net)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <pl@dlhnet.de>)
	id 1TjZmA-0001KU-0q
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 13:14:22 -0500
Message-ID: <50CB6C7C.6000403@dlhnet.de>
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 19:14:20 +0100
From: Peter Lieven <pl@dlhnet.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Qemu-devel] big wait check in ram_save_iterate()
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, quintela@redhat.com
Cc: "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>

Hi,

is the check for spending > 50ms in the loop still necessary in qemu 1.3.0?

Peter