From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <50CBA28E.5070806@ubuntu.com> Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 17:05:02 -0500 From: Phillip Susi MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <50C9F2D6.7090802@ubuntu.com> <20121214192953.GB3148@redhat.com> <50CB8477.30708@ubuntu.com> <20121214201049.GA3859@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20121214201049.GA3859@redhat.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Non 512 byte sectors Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Mike Snitzer Cc: LVM general discussion and development -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 12/14/2012 3:10 PM, Mike Snitzer wrote: > DM has no role in fabricating devices with artificial limits. What > do you hope to accomplish with this? I am trying to fix dmraid on pdc arrays that are > 2TB. It seems that pdc has the virtual disk use a larger sector size so that you can partition it with MBR. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQy6KOAAoJEJrBOlT6nu752aYH/Ax4h69oPwncDf4YGCheE9KQ WpVV5koPqaUkBd2hrB6Uj6XPjxl+ohr7amiT8w+KRfvKZcOGnWXJUre3cY/DbqBv 8nPL6aD5e2IRMPP1zVf4kaeVDc2FGEcT1GYcS7pmYZQjBxTJYS6a6zsYjkrfpNvZ l6k/Jvyfn/0zOHDWJ6w1FFO5u83vArva6hvY0HcwhZMUuTP3+U2fH/vge+GhQQWE +TD8Bv6fcjl7mZsF7dwKGUjZkPaFQ6yxnDALYiUw7O0tjtwnHf+3HAsAjCeYo7Nm L2TSjtHuAVd6ddpLMEO2SUNLcM1oropgaXL4Fuj2aoAhLjKWAgQtTOQ9dtjsWfM= =bn9p -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----