From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.saout.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.saout.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KdtWOMUum5Vy for ; Sun, 16 Dec 2012 13:25:46 +0100 (CET) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.saout.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Sun, 16 Dec 2012 13:25:46 +0100 (CET) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TkD3Y-0001OD-FI for dm-crypt@saout.de; Sun, 16 Dec 2012 13:10:56 +0100 Received: from d67-193-232-12.home3.cgocable.net ([67.193.232.12]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 16 Dec 2012 13:10:56 +0100 Received: from brian by d67-193-232-12.home3.cgocable.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 16 Dec 2012 13:10:56 +0100 From: "Brian J. Murrell" Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2012 07:10:31 -0500 Message-ID: <50CDBA37.1050308@interlinx.bc.ca> References: <5022883B.8070909@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigF2A4D1AAFC9B618D1FCCEB5C" In-Reply-To: <5022883B.8070909@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [dm-crypt] dm-crypt multithreaded yet? List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: dm-crypt@saout.de This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigF2A4D1AAFC9B618D1FCCEB5C Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 12-08-08 11:39 AM, Milan Broz wrote: >=20 > Anyway, I have patches rebased for 3.5/3.6-rc here > http://mbroz.fedorapeople.org/dm-crypt/ Unfortunately the files in http://mbroz.fedorapeople.org/dm-crypt/3.6-rc all return 403 trying to fetch them. > If you can test it and prove it helps for your use case, its would > be nice. Just take it as experimental, there can be bugs still. I was going to try this on an FC18 kernel. Are you using these patches by any chance? Cheers, b. --------------enigF2A4D1AAFC9B618D1FCCEB5C Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlDNujgACgkQl3EQlGLyuXCQNwCgnZGqJn/W25iI+Ebp/jUz8yiW 6j4AnRFEFV9vSATrTwjqBl85sQM/0YOB =qKmu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigF2A4D1AAFC9B618D1FCCEB5C--