From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pa0-f48.google.com (mail-pa0-f48.google.com [209.85.220.48]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28CABE011AB for ; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 07:50:02 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pa0-f48.google.com with SMTP id fa1so3826154pad.35 for ; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 07:50:02 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :x-gm-message-state; bh=FvWWgNnyTqtvQE+tNl7UE6AprGdnDgqfkT8xyDAQ4Sc=; b=Xx5Hv2ZK9i7D5+UOhPNBplZwOiM3oZ7WC6as57NAlIMdxlNaXFJzRDr2+sTM0FsDLZ a5VUeSVDzeudMTgZLjdy/qX/VQyKVj7Hdr2bG1y3SOshzYH3f3tBkVEs3efj+Zs0cTxW M2QK0eNCnBr3xunuVKGcq3N8CWo1N7HRWdCKqDYUK1/t0HizGQAlCQZO8D4IF1atw/k3 XDYuOQLpvaPo8VvqD3Q09/uWX6acsQ79MbqF9F/ZQ/VxY1ARaqjkTy+FPyKtOc2SkuS4 Ls4UyiWLMuylPhE2WTTxrVDvAX6IiTXp44NB92c5xi6U8Jsr2WpYPWNLkEtbNsPEhZBA d0Fg== Received: by 10.66.89.199 with SMTP id bq7mr43548964pab.26.1355759401936; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 07:50:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from [29.6.1.40] ([70.96.116.236]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id gv9sm8384339pbc.21.2012.12.17.07.49.59 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 17 Dec 2012 07:50:01 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <50CF3F25.9040503@boundarydevices.com> Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 08:49:57 -0700 From: Eric Nelson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Otavio Salvador References: <1355746177-1042-1-git-send-email-pushpalatha.sg@mistralsolutions.com> In-Reply-To: X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnPzNkrTrDx0yo0TDKMG2kqGkaoXvHtMUmBEPzoHqdGvi12cGJXFxp6rfX2c5Lbs+ydfWpU Cc: "meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org" , Pushpalatha Subject: Re: [meta-fsl-arm][PATCH] Added support for i.MX6 series Nitrogen6w board Signed-off-by: Pushpalatha X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 15:50:02 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi Otavio, On 12/17/2012 05:59 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote: > On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Daiane Angolini wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 10:09 AM, Pushpalatha >> wrote: >>> --- >>> conf/machine/imx6qnitrogen6w.conf | 18 + >>> .../support_nitrogen6x_config.patch | 27324 +++++++++++++++++++ >>> recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-fslc_2012.10.bb | 2 + >>> .../linux-imx-3.0.35/imx6qnitrogen6w/defconfig | 3020 ++ >>> .../support_for_nitrogen6_configuration.patch | 11469 ++++++++ >>> recipes-kernel/linux/linux-imx_3.0.35.bb | 3 + >>> 6 files changed, 41836 insertions(+) >>> create mode 100644 conf/machine/imx6qnitrogen6w.conf >> >> This board should be included on meta-fsl-arm-extra. Could you, >> please, rebase your patches for that project? > > In fact I think the board we have at meta-fsl-arm ought to work just > fine. I am unsure we need another board as I have added the wifi > firmware there too and Eric has tested it. > Confirmed. I built using machine type nitrogen6x and ran the result on both SABRE Lite and Nitrogen6X. > Eric, can you comment on this? > >>> create mode 100644 recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-fslc-v2012.10/imx6qnitrogen6w/support_nitrogen6x_config.patch >> >> Please, take a look https://github.com/Freescale/u-boot-imx >> This is where we get u-boot from. Itīs a fork of mainline one (denx) >> plus some patches to include some patches that will be included on >> next u-boot version or some patches to configure something rellated >> with yocto (for example, scripts for inicialization). >> >> I think itīs better to include your board (nitrogen6w) patches on that >> repository instead for supporting those patches on the recipe. >> >> But, the main question here is: Does u-boot mainline support >> nitrogen6x/nitrogen6w? > > Not yet. That's why I included u-boot-boundary recipe. > >> Whatīs the difference between nitrogen6x and nitrogen6w? May this >> board use nitrogen6x support someway? >> >> Otavio, could you, please, comment on this? I think it would only a >> matter of MACHINE_FEATURE. > > Yes, I think we can have it in same machine except if there're real > difference between them. > Except for the silk screen: nitrogen6x == nitrogen6w >>> create mode 100644 recipes-kernel/linux/linux-imx-3.0.35/imx6qnitrogen6w/defconfig >>> create mode 100644 recipes-kernel/linux/linux-imx-3.0.35/imx6qnitrogen6w/support_for_nitrogen6_configuration.patch >> >> The same is applicable to kernel. Apply patches in git repository and >> then update kernel recipe. > > I did not compare the patches but I think it should be the same we > have for sabrelite; in this case we can use overrides to avoid the > duplication (again, done in nitrogen6x board in extra repository). > > Eric, please give us some light about the board difference? > Asked and answered.