From: Gilles Chanteperdrix <gilles.chanteperdrix@xenomai.org>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>
Cc: Wolfgang Mauerer <wm@linux-kernel.net>,
"Mauerer, Wolfgang" <wolfgang.mauerer@siemens.com>,
xenomai@xenomai.org
Subject: Re: [Xenomai] core-3.5 for x86
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 15:47:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50D081EB.6080800@xenomai.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50D05218.1080406@web.de>
On 12/18/2012 12:23 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2012-12-15 20:16, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>> On 12/15/2012 11:03 PM, Wolfgang Mauerer wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Gilles,
>>>
>>> On 15/12/2012 22:24, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>>>
>>>> I see some (recent) activity on this git repository:
>>>> https://github.com/siemens/ipipe/commits/core-3.5_for-upstream
>>>>
>>>> In what state is this branch, can I pull from it?
>>> please don't pull yet, I need to port a few more patches forward
>>> and fix one known issue with the tree. But I'll try to send a
>>> pull/discussion request next week.
>>>
>>>> At least the changes allowing preempt_disable()/preempt_enable() to be
>>>> called from non-root context look dubious.
>>> are you referring to 767f0d43fe3? This one still carries a TODO
>>> item in the description to remind me to check with which
>>> non-x86 archs this can cause problems, and what we can do about
>>> them.
>>
>>
>> Actually, we already have ipipe_safe_current(), so I guess what you need
>> is ipipe_safe_current_thread_info() ?
>
> That cannot work unless you patch all the ftrace and perf stack - which
> would surely not be a good idea /wrt maintainability.
>
> The point is remove the instrumentation from preempt_disable/enable at
> least on those archs that do not need it. And then to look at the archs
> that still have stack-based thread_info, if we cannot change this, at
> least for CONFIG_IPIPE enabled.
The problem is the "then", we can not stay with a solution which works
only for x86_64. The current contents of the github tree which disables
the ipipe_root_context check on all architectures can not be merged as is.
--
Gilles.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-12-18 14:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <50CCEA7E.1080000__518.307140055363$1355606686$gmane$org@xenomai.org>
2012-12-15 22:03 ` [Xenomai] core-3.5 for x86 Wolfgang Mauerer
2012-12-15 22:07 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2012-12-15 22:16 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2012-12-17 16:08 ` Wolfgang Mauerer
2012-12-17 19:12 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2012-12-18 11:23 ` Jan Kiszka
2012-12-18 14:47 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix [this message]
2012-12-18 14:58 ` Wolfgang Mauerer
2012-12-19 21:06 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2012-12-20 16:22 ` Wolfgang Mauerer
2012-12-20 16:25 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2012-12-20 16:34 ` Wolfgang Mauerer
2012-12-21 0:28 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2012-12-21 9:08 ` Wolfgang Mauerer
2012-12-15 21:24 Gilles Chanteperdrix
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50D081EB.6080800@xenomai.org \
--to=gilles.chanteperdrix@xenomai.org \
--cc=jan.kiszka@web.de \
--cc=wm@linux-kernel.net \
--cc=wolfgang.mauerer@siemens.com \
--cc=xenomai@xenomai.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.