From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kukjin Kim Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: add pinctrl nodes for Exynos5250 SoC Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 09:08:59 -0800 Message-ID: <50D0A32B.9050400@samsung.com> References: <1355403978-388-1-git-send-email-thomas.abraham@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-arm-kernel-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: Linus Walleij Cc: kgene.kim@samsung.com, patches@linaro.org, t.figa@samsung.com, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Abraham , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org On 12/14/12 12:34, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Thomas Abraham > wrote: > >> Add pinctrl device nodes for Exynos5250 SoC. >> >> Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham > > Acked-by: Linus Walleij > >> - The individual device nodes which are using the old style Samsung gpio >> bindings have not been converted over to pinctrl bindings yet. It might >> also be important to know if Linus's pinctrl grab in device core patch >> (http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1409263) gets accepted. > > Greg seems happy with it and the plan is to have it merged for kernel > v3.9. > > I intend to push Greg for an ACK and queue it for linux-next right after the > merge window. > Same here ;-) >> - This patch should not be merged for now which otherwise would break existing >> platforms which are using the old samsung gpio driver bindings. This patch >> is intended to get started with the migration to pinctrl framework. >> It is probably better to first prepare all the migration patches and >> merge them as a bunch. > > Sure. I guess it'll be taken through the Samsung tree anyway, right? > I'm OK on this, if Greg is OK, then let me pick this up in Samsung tree. Thanks. Best regards, Kgene. -- Kukjin Kim , Senior Engineer, SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: kgene.kim@samsung.com (Kukjin Kim) Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 09:08:59 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] ARM: dts: add pinctrl nodes for Exynos5250 SoC In-Reply-To: References: <1355403978-388-1-git-send-email-thomas.abraham@linaro.org> Message-ID: <50D0A32B.9050400@samsung.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 12/14/12 12:34, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Thomas Abraham > wrote: > >> Add pinctrl device nodes for Exynos5250 SoC. >> >> Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham > > Acked-by: Linus Walleij > >> - The individual device nodes which are using the old style Samsung gpio >> bindings have not been converted over to pinctrl bindings yet. It might >> also be important to know if Linus's pinctrl grab in device core patch >> (http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1409263) gets accepted. > > Greg seems happy with it and the plan is to have it merged for kernel > v3.9. > > I intend to push Greg for an ACK and queue it for linux-next right after the > merge window. > Same here ;-) >> - This patch should not be merged for now which otherwise would break existing >> platforms which are using the old samsung gpio driver bindings. This patch >> is intended to get started with the migration to pinctrl framework. >> It is probably better to first prepare all the migration patches and >> merge them as a bunch. > > Sure. I guess it'll be taken through the Samsung tree anyway, right? > I'm OK on this, if Greg is OK, then let me pick this up in Samsung tree. Thanks. Best regards, Kgene. -- Kukjin Kim , Senior Engineer, SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.