From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Ujfalusi Subject: Re: 32kHz clock removal causes problems omap_hsmmc Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 11:18:11 +0100 Message-ID: <50D19463.5010605@ti.com> References: <1352968293.10872.51.camel@cumari.coelho.fi> <20121218095450.GB27751@arwen.pp.htv.fi> <20121219094552.GN4985@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <50D19040.5090404@ti.com> <20121219100909.GO4985@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from arroyo.ext.ti.com ([192.94.94.40]:49163 "EHLO arroyo.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750810Ab2LSKSS (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Dec 2012 05:18:18 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20121219100909.GO4985@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Sender: linux-mmc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org To: Mark Brown Cc: Felipe Balbi , Luciano Coelho , svenkatr@ti.com, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, cjb@laptop.org, lrg@ti.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tony Lindgren On 12/19/2012 11:09 AM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 11:00:32AM +0100, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: >=20 >> I don't know the state of the common clock framework for OMAPs. Is i= t already >> up in 3.7? Or going for 3.8? 3.9? 3.10?... >> We need CCF to resolve this. I can cook up the clock driver for the = 32k clock >> from twl, but in order to use it we need CCF on OMAP. >=20 > Well, we at least ought to make sure it doesn't appear in the regulat= or > DT bindings even if it's handled via some OMAP magic - that was the k= ey > point here. Sure. It must be a clock driver. I already have similar driver (for McP= DM fclk clock) for twl6040. Let me check linux-next, if CCF is there for OMAP I can send the 32k cl= ock driver soon (after writing it and testing it). It is going to be for 3.= 9 but we can roll it with us I think locally to resolv issues. --=20 P=E9ter From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754546Ab2LSKS0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Dec 2012 05:18:26 -0500 Received: from arroyo.ext.ti.com ([192.94.94.40]:49163 "EHLO arroyo.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750810Ab2LSKSS (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Dec 2012 05:18:18 -0500 Message-ID: <50D19463.5010605@ti.com> Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 11:18:11 +0100 From: Peter Ujfalusi User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Brown CC: Felipe Balbi , Luciano Coelho , , , , , , , Tony Lindgren Subject: Re: 32kHz clock removal causes problems omap_hsmmc References: <1352968293.10872.51.camel@cumari.coelho.fi> <20121218095450.GB27751@arwen.pp.htv.fi> <20121219094552.GN4985@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <50D19040.5090404@ti.com> <20121219100909.GO4985@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> In-Reply-To: <20121219100909.GO4985@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 12/19/2012 11:09 AM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 11:00:32AM +0100, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: > >> I don't know the state of the common clock framework for OMAPs. Is it already >> up in 3.7? Or going for 3.8? 3.9? 3.10?... >> We need CCF to resolve this. I can cook up the clock driver for the 32k clock >> from twl, but in order to use it we need CCF on OMAP. > > Well, we at least ought to make sure it doesn't appear in the regulator > DT bindings even if it's handled via some OMAP magic - that was the key > point here. Sure. It must be a clock driver. I already have similar driver (for McPDM fclk clock) for twl6040. Let me check linux-next, if CCF is there for OMAP I can send the 32k clock driver soon (after writing it and testing it). It is going to be for 3.9 but we can roll it with us I think locally to resolv issues. -- Péter