From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751960Ab2LSXoI (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Dec 2012 18:44:08 -0500 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:48003 "EHLO mail.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751175Ab2LSXoC (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Dec 2012 18:44:02 -0500 Message-ID: <50D25128.7030205@zytor.com> Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 15:43:36 -0800 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Yinghai Lu CC: Borislav Petkov , Jacob Shin , "H. Peter Anvin" , "Yu, Fenghua" , "mingo@kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "tglx@linutronix.de" , "linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org" , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , Stefano Stabellini Subject: Re: [tip:x86/microcode] x86/microcode_intel_early.c: Early update ucode on Intel's CPU References: <50CCEE49.3080801@zytor.com> <50CCF6F6.4020107@zytor.com> <50CD04F1.8020902@zytor.com> <0dcbce7a-d2ae-44fa-9658-81590f71ec47@email.android.com> <20121219220504.GA32212@jshin-Toonie> <50D23EE8.7030904@zytor.com> <20121219225155.GK24895@liondog.tnic> <20121219225941.GB2968@jshin-Toonie> <20121219230329.GM24895@liondog.tnic> <50D24C25.5050604@zytor.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 12/19/2012 03:40 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote: > On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 3:22 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote: >> The other bit is that building the real kernel page tables iteratively >> (ignoring the early page tables here) is safer, since the real page >> table builder is fully aware of the memory map. This means any >> "spillover" from the early page tables gets minimized to regions where >> there are data objects that have to be accessed early. Since Yinghai >> already had iterative page table building working, I don't see any >> reason to not use that capability. > > that is v6, right? > > including that patch > No, that's just a different way to create the early page tables (and it doesn't solve anything, quite on the contrary.) I'm talking about the strategy for creating the *permanent* page tables -hpa -- H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.