From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Ujfalusi Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: omap_twl: Change TWL4030_MODULE_PM_RECEIVER to TWL_MODULE_PM_RECEIVER Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 13:52:02 +0100 Message-ID: <50D45B72.2050300@ti.com> References: <1352799152-20980-1-git-send-email-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> <50A4A376.3020703@ti.com> <20121121215234.GB5279@atomide.com> <50ADFDD3.1080508@ti.com> <20121214171800.GO4989@atomide.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from devils.ext.ti.com ([198.47.26.153]:38750 "EHLO devils.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751655Ab2LUMwH (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Dec 2012 07:52:07 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20121214171800.GO4989@atomide.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Tony Lindgren Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Nishanth Menon Hi Tony, On 12/14/2012 06:18 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Peter Ujfalusi [121122 02:28]: >> Hi Tony, >> >> On 11/21/2012 10:52 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote: >>> * Peter Ujfalusi [121115 00:12]: >>>> Hi Tony, >>>> >>>> On 11/13/2012 10:32 AM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: >>>>> To facilitate upcoming cleanup in twl stack. >>>>> No functional change. >>>> >>>> Would you please consider this patch for 3.8? It would shorten the= time I'll >>>> need to progress on the cleanup regarding to twl-core greatly. >>> >>> Please go ahead and merge this with your other patches: >>> >>> Acked-by: Tony Lindgren >>> >>> Or let me know if I still need to queue it. >> >> This patch has no dependencies on other patches. It is better to go = via >> linux-omap. >=20 > Applying into omap-for-v3.8/fixes-for-merge-window. Today I looked at: omap-for-v3.8/fixes-for-merge-window-part2 omap-for-v3.8/fixes-for-merge-window-v4 omap-for-v3.8/fixes-non-critical-v2 branches as well linux-next, mainline, but I can not find this patch. I= want to send the second part of the twl-core cleanup series which needs this= patch to be in first. Can you make sure this is going for 3.8? Thank you, P=E9ter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: peter.ujfalusi@ti.com (Peter Ujfalusi) Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 13:52:02 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: omap_twl: Change TWL4030_MODULE_PM_RECEIVER to TWL_MODULE_PM_RECEIVER In-Reply-To: <20121214171800.GO4989@atomide.com> References: <1352799152-20980-1-git-send-email-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> <50A4A376.3020703@ti.com> <20121121215234.GB5279@atomide.com> <50ADFDD3.1080508@ti.com> <20121214171800.GO4989@atomide.com> Message-ID: <50D45B72.2050300@ti.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Tony, On 12/14/2012 06:18 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Peter Ujfalusi [121122 02:28]: >> Hi Tony, >> >> On 11/21/2012 10:52 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote: >>> * Peter Ujfalusi [121115 00:12]: >>>> Hi Tony, >>>> >>>> On 11/13/2012 10:32 AM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: >>>>> To facilitate upcoming cleanup in twl stack. >>>>> No functional change. >>>> >>>> Would you please consider this patch for 3.8? It would shorten the time I'll >>>> need to progress on the cleanup regarding to twl-core greatly. >>> >>> Please go ahead and merge this with your other patches: >>> >>> Acked-by: Tony Lindgren >>> >>> Or let me know if I still need to queue it. >> >> This patch has no dependencies on other patches. It is better to go via >> linux-omap. > > Applying into omap-for-v3.8/fixes-for-merge-window. Today I looked at: omap-for-v3.8/fixes-for-merge-window-part2 omap-for-v3.8/fixes-for-merge-window-v4 omap-for-v3.8/fixes-non-critical-v2 branches as well linux-next, mainline, but I can not find this patch. I want to send the second part of the twl-core cleanup series which needs this patch to be in first. Can you make sure this is going for 3.8? Thank you, P?ter