From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752431Ab2LUQsJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Dec 2012 11:48:09 -0500 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:36877 "EHLO mail.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751897Ab2LUQr7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Dec 2012 11:47:59 -0500 Message-ID: <50D49290.2030403@zytor.com> Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 08:47:12 -0800 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dave Young CC: Yinghai Lu , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Jacob Shin , Andrew Morton , Stefano Stabellini , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 05/46] x86, mm: Revert back good_end setting for 64bit References: <1354139277-17376-1-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org> <1354139277-17376-6-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 12/21/2012 12:22 AM, Dave Young wrote: > On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 5:47 AM, Yinghai Lu wrote: > > Hi, Yinghai and HPA > > What's the staus of this patch, will it go for 3.8? Is there anything > blocking this patch? > It's 3.9 material at this point. The sheer size and messiness of the whole set has been the holdup. -hpa -- H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.