From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <eric.nelson@boundarydevices.com>
Received: from mail-pb0-f44.google.com (mail-pb0-f44.google.com
	[209.85.160.44])
	by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64F35E0142C
	for <meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org>;
	Fri, 21 Dec 2012 10:37:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pb0-f44.google.com with SMTP id uo1so2901284pbc.17
	for <meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org>;
	Fri, 21 Dec 2012 10:37:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=google.com; s=20120113;
	h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc
	:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state;
	bh=FHcNnuvhmWjzb8aHubDx1uJGvu9C/PIq1mZhW/IGgrg=;
	b=UynAgxNOFTryobXio597sx8x/e2wKLIfGjBxvZ9zBU4pw6JDlBFhQb1fyI69A0ywtD
	IJq2Lex/hdt8dhp0aiuwEXqMWdUVxVvWr8hjow6hsRk7VvDQEm56s2/H17m9q6YiyIrZ
	odcV0u9q+xlPT1fYmRlCGejDJAhdkWoKmO+kAeEkfm184I5FwOm7ppEcS9JVR3aAaDLf
	ZndCbIFKwms5FpU7mzSFmkBhxfywF4fRMGC4gEtSaCQFWSRWJGAI68aA+ZNIK7/pODQ2
	7IVhQldJkEBHKa38BoTQ87pyiL4rdQrt2h4FhhFW919fUCXilipLr0BYxMCiXNapjzHO
	6GEA==
X-Received: by 10.68.232.71 with SMTP id tm7mr42401869pbc.118.1356115071180;
	Fri, 21 Dec 2012 10:37:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.0.55] ([70.96.116.236])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x2sm7803162paw.8.2012.12.21.10.37.49
	(version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 21 Dec 2012 10:37:50 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <50D4AC7C.80004@boundarydevices.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 11:37:48 -0700
From: Eric Nelson <eric.nelson@boundarydevices.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
	rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br>
References: <1356107115-22099-1-git-send-email-gary@mlbassoc.com>
	<1356107115-22099-4-git-send-email-gary@mlbassoc.com>
	<CAP9ODKo2DzjS+2Py1SPBdmmjzt7N0x9q32h7bu3bQ9n=VwBsig@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAP9ODKo2DzjS+2Py1SPBdmmjzt7N0x9q32h7bu3bQ9n=VwBsig@mail.gmail.com>
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQm96ffHM2WSyMJBHXtxfmCJMPlkRJnCw7GOFEIoD0DppUJwA7XheI5yTlLBaf2X+v03B6ZR
Cc: "meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org" <meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org>
Subject: Re: [meta-fsl-arm][PATCH 3/3] imx6qsabrelite/defconfig: Enable devtmpfs
X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers
	<meta-freescale.yoctoproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.yoctoproject.org/options/meta-freescale>,
	<mailto:meta-freescale-request@yoctoproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/meta-freescale>
List-Post: <mailto:meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:meta-freescale-request@yoctoproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale>,
	<mailto:meta-freescale-request@yoctoproject.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 18:37:51 -0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 12/21/2012 10:19 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Gary Thomas <gary@mlbassoc.com> wrote:
>> Recent versions of udev (182 in OE-core) need devtmpfs to operate correctly
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gary Thomas <gary@mlbassoc.com>
>
> Merged to master with reworded commit log and bump PR.
>

Hi Otavio,

I have a configuration patch to make, adding CONFIG_FEC_NAPI.

Should I submit it with a bump in PR as you did, or without, so
that you can coordinate that?

The patch itself is to prevent network performance from cratering
under load as discussed in this blog post:
	http://boundarydevices.com/i-mx6-ethernet/

And in this patch:
	https://github.com/boundarydevices/linux-imx6/commit/38d622938f1352a6550a5e38c624b46b6929439f

Without it, network receive performance can get really bad under
load.

Please advise,


Eric