From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp.webfaction.com (mail6.webfaction.com [74.55.86.74]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0AB6E006B4 for ; Mon, 24 Dec 2012 07:28:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.11] (c-68-46-169-75.hsd1.nj.comcast.net [68.46.169.75]) by smtp.webfaction.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A38B026EF13E; Mon, 24 Dec 2012 09:28:23 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <50D87496.6010107@mindchasers.com> Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2012 10:28:22 -0500 From: Bob Cochran User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Luo Zhenhua-B19537 References: <50D7F3EA.5030003@mindchasers.com> In-Reply-To: Cc: "meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Re: QorIQ SDKV1.3: bitbake chokes on parsing package.bbclass... X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2012 15:28:24 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 12/24/2012 01:58 AM, Luo Zhenhua-B19537 wrote: > Bob, > > Have you met the parse error when building default rootfs images? I guess this issue only happens on your customized recipe, right? Hi Zhenhua, I only tried two things after installing sdkv1.3: bitbake core-image-minimal (no build problems) and bitbake (had the parse problem with package.bbclass) I'm wondering why you bother bundling poky with your SDK. Why not just release the meta-fsl-* layers and point the user to which poky branch & tag you tested against? If this was the case, then I would just need to fast forward the poky branch to pick up patches. I continue to be confused why FSL maintains two repos for meta-fsl-ppc. The one on git.freescale.com is obviously ahead, but the one on yocto does have some recent, selective patches. As a SW developer for QorIQ, it would be my preference that the yocto (BSP) repositories for meta-fsl-* were just a mirror of git.freescale.com and Freescale wouldn't bother to maintain a separate poky repo (just patch the one on yocto / OE and reference it). Wouldn't this be easier for everyone? Any clarification would be greatly appreciated. This SDK has been verified on typical Linux distros(Ubuntu, Redhat, Fedora, CentOS, openSUSE) with Python 2.6/2.7. > > BTW, what's the Linux distro and python version on your machine? FYI: I use Ubuntu 12.04.1, and Python 2.7.3 Thanks, Bob > > > Best Regards, > > Zhenhua > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: meta-freescale-bounces@yoctoproject.org [mailto:meta-freescale- >> bounces@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Bob Cochran >> Sent: Monday, December 24, 2012 2:19 PM >> To: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org >> Subject: [meta-freescale] QorIQ SDKV1.3: bitbake chokes on parsing >> package.bbclass... >> >> Hello, >> >> Just started working with yocto sdkv1.3 tonight, which I downloaded from >> FSL web site. I'm working with p1010rdb, and I tried to bake some custom >> recipes. >> >> parse_python() inside codeparser.py errors (IndentationError: unexpected >> indent) when it tries to parse python function populate_packages inside >> package.bbclass. >> >> It looks like it is choking on the tabs inside populate_packages(). >> >> FYI: package.bbclass was patched on yocto's poky master branch on 7/11 to >> convert tabs into 4 spaces (commit: >> bfd279de3275abbfaf3e630383ec244131e0375f). >> >> Looking at FSL's poky.git on git.freescale.com, it appears that this >> patch wasn't picked up. >> >> Bob >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> meta-freescale mailing list >> meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org >> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale > > >