From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <50DC9C51.9090300@antcom.de> Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2012 20:06:57 +0100 From: Roland Stigge MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <50CD8E87.2070906@xenomai.org> <201212170945.47992.leo@alaxarxa.net> <50CEFB24.9000306@antcom.de> <201212171453.44318.leo@alaxarxa.net> In-Reply-To: <201212171453.44318.leo@alaxarxa.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Xenomai] next xenomai release List-Id: Discussions about the Xenomai project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda Cc: xenomai@xenomai.org On 17/12/12 14:53, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote: > A Dilluns 17 Desembre 2012, Roland Stigge va escriure: >> On 12/17/2012 09:45 AM, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote: >>> there's a bug, and I must admit that I don't know if it's deliberated (*) > or >>> not. This bug comes from some time ago. In the /ksrc/arch/x86/patches >>> directory, there's a patch for the 3.2.21 kernel: >>> >>> ipipe-core-3.2.21-x86-1.patch >>> >>> this patch, in the build process is not included in the root directory: > the >>> /scripts/prepare-patch.sh script executes: >>> >>> find $xenomai_root/ksrc/ -name "adeos-ipipe-2.6.*-$supported_arch-*.patch" >>> >>> that is incorrect because the ipipe-core* patch is not found. The correct > one >>> would be: >>> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >>> $ diff -u xenomai-2.6.git/scripts/prepare-patch.sh xenomai- >>> head/scripts/prepare-patch.sh >>> --- xenomai-2.6.git/scripts/prepare-patch.sh 2012-11-06 > 11:17:56.722698342 >>> +0100 >>> +++ xenomai-head/scripts/prepare-patch.sh 2012-12-17 > 09:23:31.912258850 >>> +0100 >>> @@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ >>> >>> cd $xenomai_root >>> >>> -find $xenomai_root/ksrc/ -name "*ipipe*$supported_arch-*.patch" | >>> +find $xenomai_root/ksrc/ -name "adeos-ipipe-2.6.*-$supported_arch- > *.patch" | >>> while read f ; do >>> >>> file=`basename $f` >>> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> I guess this is a reverse patch? > > :-) > > yes, the order is inverse. Sorry. OK, should be fixed. Can't find the change in xenomai 2.6.2, unfortunately. Roland