From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp.webfaction.com (mail6.webfaction.com [74.55.86.74]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A8C8E006C2 for ; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 06:49:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.11] (c-68-46-169-75.hsd1.nj.comcast.net [68.46.169.75]) by smtp.webfaction.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85FBB26EF6BF for ; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 08:49:48 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <50DDB18B.5000704@mindchasers.com> Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2012 09:49:47 -0500 From: Bob Cochran User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org" Subject: [qoriq] shouldn't fsl-image-minimal.bb inherit image-types-uboot? X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2012 14:49:49 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, Working from the master branches of both poky and meta-fsl-ppc, I just built a fresh image of fsl-image-minimal and noticed that fsl-image-minimal-.ext2.gz.u-boot links to a non existent file. Since ext2.gz.u-boot is one of the IMAGE_FSTYPES, I believe the intent is to build a rootfs that is bootable by u-boot. However, I believe image_types_uboot needs to be inherited in the recipe. Therefore, I modified the recipe to have: inherit core-image image_types_uboot Can someone from Freescale please comment on this? Do you want the minimal image recipe to build a u-boot bootable rootfs? If so, I think we want to patch the recipe. Thanks, Bob