All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: fabio.baltieri@linaro.org, viresh.kumar@linaro.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] Fix problem with cpufreq_ondemand or cpufreq_conservative
Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2012 09:39:16 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50DF0EA4.8090603@lwfinger.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2035804.da5iyiYDGE@vostro.rjw.lan>

On 12/29/2012 07:27 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Friday, December 28, 2012 07:55:20 PM Larry Finger wrote:
>> Since commit 2aacdff entitled "cpufreq: Move common part from governors
>> to separate file", whenever the drivers that depend on this new file
>> (cpufreq_ondemand or cpufreq_conservative) are built as modules, a new
>> module named cpufreq_governor is created because the Makefile includes
>> cpufreq_governor.o twice. As drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c contains no
>> MODULE directives, the resulting module has no license specified, which
>> results in logging of a "module license 'unspecified' taints kernel". In
>> addition, a number of globals are exported GPL only, and are therefore
>> not available. This fix establishes a new boolean configuration variable
>> that forces cpufreq_governor.o to be linked into the kernel whenever
>> either cpufreq_ondemand or cpufreq_conservative is selected.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
>> ---
>> V3 changes only Kconfig and Makefile and avoids creating a new module.
>
> OK, thanks for the patch!
>
> If you don't mind, I'll rename CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOVERNOR to
> CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_COMMON when applying it, though.

No problem. It occurred to me that if one can do logic in a Makefile, then the 
extra configuration variable can be eliminated. I still need to check if that is 
possible.

Larry

>
> Thanks,
> Rafael
>
>
>>   Kconfig  |    5 +++++
>>   Makefile |    5 +++--
>>   2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> Index: wireless-testing-new/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig
>> ===================================================================
>> --- wireless-testing-new.orig/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig
>> +++ wireless-testing-new/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig
>> @@ -20,6 +20,9 @@ if CPU_FREQ
>>   config CPU_FREQ_TABLE
>>   	tristate
>>
>> +config CPU_FREQ_GOVERNOR
>> +	bool
>> +
>>   config CPU_FREQ_STAT
>>   	tristate "CPU frequency translation statistics"
>>   	select CPU_FREQ_TABLE
>> @@ -141,6 +144,7 @@ config CPU_FREQ_GOV_USERSPACE
>>   config CPU_FREQ_GOV_ONDEMAND
>>   	tristate "'ondemand' cpufreq policy governor"
>>   	select CPU_FREQ_TABLE
>> +	select CPU_FREQ_GOVERNOR
>>   	help
>>   	  'ondemand' - This driver adds a dynamic cpufreq policy governor.
>>   	  The governor does a periodic polling and
>> @@ -159,6 +163,7 @@ config CPU_FREQ_GOV_ONDEMAND
>>   config CPU_FREQ_GOV_CONSERVATIVE
>>   	tristate "'conservative' cpufreq governor"
>>   	depends on CPU_FREQ
>> +	select CPU_FREQ_GOVERNOR
>>   	help
>>   	  'conservative' - this driver is rather similar to the 'ondemand'
>>   	  governor both in its source code and its purpose, the difference is
>> Index: wireless-testing-new/drivers/cpufreq/Makefile
>> ===================================================================
>> --- wireless-testing-new.orig/drivers/cpufreq/Makefile
>> +++ wireless-testing-new/drivers/cpufreq/Makefile
>> @@ -7,8 +7,9 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_STAT)
>>   obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_PERFORMANCE)	+= cpufreq_performance.o
>>   obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_POWERSAVE)	+= cpufreq_powersave.o
>>   obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_USERSPACE)	+= cpufreq_userspace.o
>> -obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_ONDEMAND)	+= cpufreq_ondemand.o cpufreq_governor.o
>> -obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_CONSERVATIVE)	+= cpufreq_conservative.o cpufreq_governor.o
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_ONDEMAND)	+= cpufreq_ondemand.o
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_CONSERVATIVE)	+= cpufreq_conservative.o
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOVERNOR)		+= cpufreq_governor.o
>>
>>   # CPUfreq cross-arch helpers
>>   obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_TABLE)		+= freq_table.o

  reply	other threads:[~2012-12-29 15:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-12-29  1:55 [PATCH V3] Fix problem with cpufreq_ondemand or cpufreq_conservative Larry Finger
2012-12-29 13:27 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-12-29 15:39   ` Larry Finger [this message]
2012-12-29 17:24   ` Larry Finger
2012-12-29 21:54     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-02  3:57   ` Viresh Kumar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50DF0EA4.8090603@lwfinger.net \
    --to=larry.finger@lwfinger.net \
    --cc=fabio.baltieri@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.