From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from list by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.71) id 1Tq7VZ-0002Qi-Jq for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Jan 2013 14:28:17 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:47110) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tq7VV-0002Qa-Mi for grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Jan 2013 14:28:16 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tq7VU-0004Gs-KA for grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Jan 2013 14:28:13 -0500 Received: from mail-ee0-f53.google.com ([74.125.83.53]:64360) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tq7VU-0004Gn-Ct for grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Jan 2013 14:28:12 -0500 Received: by mail-ee0-f53.google.com with SMTP id c50so6490000eek.12 for ; Tue, 01 Jan 2013 11:28:11 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type; bh=nYfpBZy9hzPx4Z/Cva5LXxp+saqP5PGxN6XwjaXTuMs=; b=RERChTQRWK+6/OcvicCHwk3gQODRIDevZFr7DAEniJchbEoX9Kuy06aodO0ahB/kB2 n0I66cxVHNHA2gEByP3TdSk1McoSilITmfMha9iVJ3XH+OHyzHhVsOJ/HOffOLNopPT/ QoNh8bACrnR9CKHes5JJOuy9ZR6IA+iyLgVPZb4ZRc62R3jB95aDPmoiFJLsITD4tC4n pF9MSo5BGaV0o9eO+leNyj0w7wgu4IhTbKAHnulMWg/VfdWOmvqpAt4S3vozL4kWObrY K/NGkAyNjIVsMtdmzWfJ9O3ikBuKrj9kDsZqkufzpJSqorJIAnjqBNj0WM3heHbXJpi/ n3uQ== X-Received: by 10.14.218.69 with SMTP id j45mr119599759eep.35.1357068491051; Tue, 01 Jan 2013 11:28:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from debian.x201.phnet (13.126.202.62.cust.bluewin.ch. [62.202.126.13]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b49sm93126664eem.16.2013.01.01.11.28.09 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 01 Jan 2013 11:28:10 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <50E338C5.7070709@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2013 20:28:05 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?VmxhZGltaXIgJ8+GLWNvZGVyL3BoY29kZXInIFNlcmJpbmVua28=?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.11) Gecko/20121122 Icedove/10.0.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: The development of GNU GRUB Subject: Re: [PATCH] Removing nested functions, part one of lots References: <20130101144204.GZ21216@riva.dynamic.greenend.org.uk> <6B24AAA7-66FE-43BF-AA87-599D4CD24C2E@oracle.com> In-Reply-To: <6B24AAA7-66FE-43BF-AA87-599D4CD24C2E@oracle.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.1 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigBC908B0D9D7DC6B5A1FC7995" X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 74.125.83.53 X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GNU GRUB List-Id: The development of GNU GRUB List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2013 19:28:16 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigBC908B0D9D7DC6B5A1FC7995 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 01.01.2013 19:31, Seth Goldberg wrote: > Yay!! Does this change the minimum GCC version needed to build? We don't support anything older than 4.2. That's unlikely to change. --=20 Regards Vladimir '=CF=86-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko --------------enigBC908B0D9D7DC6B5A1FC7995 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iF4EAREKAAYFAlDjOMYACgkQNak7dOguQgmAVQEAxHkW4RvEZEMpBHSzyN4I27gg DPWGV9wDlCsjPr51vQsA/1akpSuXS+5HNgsQoA5DKWdjX6iQZ+i6r+jDRSkAJjOz =WHGy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigBC908B0D9D7DC6B5A1FC7995--