From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga03.intel.com ([143.182.124.21]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Tqfux-0004hD-Cq for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 09:12:49 +0100 Received: from azsmga001.ch.intel.com ([10.2.17.19]) by azsmga101.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 02 Jan 2013 23:57:42 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,402,1355126400"; d="scan'208";a="239424111" Received: from dell-desktop (HELO [10.237.105.59]) ([10.237.105.59]) by azsmga001.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 02 Jan 2013 23:57:41 -0800 Message-ID: <50E53B68.6020505@intel.com> Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 10:03:52 +0200 From: Radu Moisan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Eggleton References: <50D8FDBE.4030203@linux.intel.com> <50DDABA4.70309@intel.com> <4078626.EH4CM1sFWo@helios> In-Reply-To: <4078626.EH4CM1sFWo@helios> Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/28][RFC] systemd Integration X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 08:12:49 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 01/01/2013 12:10 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote: > On Friday 28 December 2012 16:24:36 Radu Moisan wrote: >> On 12/25/2012 03:13 AM, Saul Wold wrote: >>> Also, you do not provide very clear information at the beginning, but >>> I assume to enable systemd, it's just setting DISTRO_FEATURE += >>> "systemd", or is there more? >> DISTRO_FEATURES_INITMAN = "systemd" it's all you need. DISTRO_FEATURE += >> "systemd" might also work in some extent since I'm checking against >> DISTRO_FEATURES, however there are variables like >> VIRTUAL_RUNTIME_init_manager (which is inherited legacy) which get set >> from DISTRO_FEATURES_INITMAN. The way to go is with DISTRO_FEATURES_INITMAN. > Can you explain why we need another variable for this? Initially I went for VIRTUAL-RUNTIME_init_manager, but Richard suggested I should get rid of lower case ambiguity and he proposed DISTRO_FEATURES_INITMAN. Radu