From: Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout@mind.be>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [RFC] How to handle targets that need more than one file system to boot?
Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 09:53:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50E54714.8060602@mind.be> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201301030940.07495.yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
On 01/03/13 09:40, Yann E. MORIN wrote:
> Steve, All,
>
> On Thursday 03 January 2013 01:32:52 Steve Calfee wrote:
>> > On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 3:56 PM, Yann E. MORIN<yann.morin.1998@free.fr> wrote:
>>> > > Arnout, Steve, All,
>>> > >
>>> > > On Wednesday 02 January 2013 Arnout Vandecappelle wrote:
>>>> > >> On 12/25/12 04:52, Steve Calfee wrote:
>>>>> > >> > On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Yann E. MORIN<yann.morin.1998@free.fr> wrote:
>>> > > [--SNIP--]
>>>>>> > >> >> For now, buildroot can build a single filesystem image. This is not useable
>>>>>> > >> >> for these systems. The only possibility as of today is to configure BR to
>>>>>> > >> >> generate a tarball, and have a custom script that does the required split up
>>>>>> > >> >> of the different components.
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> That's not really true, is it? Buildroot generates the ext2fs and the
>>>> > >> boot loader and kernel images, you only have to create the partitions and
>>>> > >> the fatfs and pull everything together into a single image.
>>> > >
>>> > > So, you said the same as me: Buildroot (without external tools) can
>>> > > not generate more than one*filesystem* image (ext2, tar, whatever).
>>> > >
>> >
>> > Hi Yann,
>> >
>> > Maybe we are talking about different things. I think there is a config
>> > option in buildroot that allows you to build multiple output
>> > filesystems, I believe I have created ext4 and a tar.gz as outputs. I
>> > think there are also various flash file systems you can create.
> Indeed, we're not speaking the same. Yes, Buildroot can generate different
> filesystem images with the*same* content.
>
> I am trying to address the case where different parts of the filesystem
> hierarchy have to be stored in different filesystems, because they have
> to be in different partitions.
>
> For example, on the Raspberry Pi, we have to have:
> - the first partition must be vfat and must contain the few binary
> blobs (bootloader and config for the GPU, the Linux kernel and its
> command line)
> - the rest of the filesystem hierarchy can be whatever (eg. an extN
> filesystem for / on the second partition, and another one for /home
> on yet a third partition)
>
> Buildroot can not handle this case, which is the one I want to address
> if it makes sense.
I think the usual case is that you have one rootfs image (e.g. ext2)
and a number of other component images (e.g. bootloader, boot script,
config for the GPU). Buildroot puts each of these in the images
directory. In _some_ cases (e.g. RPi), the non-rootfs components should
be put together into a fat filesystem. It is true that buildroot doesn't
have support for that, but it is relatively simple to do that in a
post-build script:
mkfs.vfat /dev/sdb1
sudo mount /dev/sdb1 /mnt
cp output/images/* /mnt
sudo umount /mnt
There is certainly no need to split up the rootfs itself. (Unless the
RPi-specific things install stuff in the rootfs while it really should go
into the images directory, but that's a different issue).
AFAIK there is no equivalent of genext2fs for FAT, so it would be
rather difficult to make a boot-vfat.img in buildroot (use sudo? fuse?
pmount?).
Regards,
Arnout
--
Arnout Vandecappelle arnout at mind be
Senior Embedded Software Architect +32-16-286500
Essensium/Mind http://www.mind.be
G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven
LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle
GPG fingerprint: 7CB5 E4CC 6C2E EFD4 6E3D A754 F963 ECAB 2450 2F1F
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-03 8:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-24 0:00 [Buildroot] [RFC] How to handle targets that need more than one file system to boot? Yann E. MORIN
2012-12-25 3:52 ` Steve Calfee
2013-01-02 6:57 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2013-01-02 23:56 ` Yann E. MORIN
2013-01-03 0:32 ` Steve Calfee
2013-01-03 8:31 ` Willy Lambert
2013-01-03 17:33 ` Yann E. MORIN
2013-01-03 17:54 ` Bjørn Forsman
2013-01-03 18:08 ` Yann E. MORIN
2013-01-03 8:40 ` Yann E. MORIN
2013-01-03 8:52 ` Jeremy Rosen
2013-01-03 8:53 ` Arnout Vandecappelle [this message]
2013-01-03 8:57 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-01-03 9:13 ` Yann E. MORIN
2013-01-03 10:30 ` Peter Korsgaard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50E54714.8060602@mind.be \
--to=arnout@mind.be \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.