From: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
To: "ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org" <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH REPOST 5/5] rbd: don't bother setting snapid in rbd_do_request()
Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 17:19:44 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50E61210.6050906@inktank.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50E61175.7010103@inktank.com>
For some reason, the snapid field of the osd request header is
explicitly set to CEPH_NOSNAP in rbd_do_request(). Just a few lines
later--with no code that would access this field in between--a call
is made to ceph_calc_raw_layout() passing the snapid provided to
rbd_do_request(), which encodes the snapid value it is provided into
that field instead.
In other words, there is no need to fill in CEPH_NOSNAP, and doing
so suggests it might be necessary. Don't do that any more.
Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
---
drivers/block/rbd.c | 4 ----
1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/block/rbd.c b/drivers/block/rbd.c
index 821d93c..cc12154 100644
--- a/drivers/block/rbd.c
+++ b/drivers/block/rbd.c
@@ -1132,7 +1132,6 @@ static int rbd_do_request(struct request *rq,
u64 bno;
struct timespec mtime = CURRENT_TIME;
struct rbd_request *rbd_req;
- struct ceph_osd_request_head *reqhead;
struct ceph_osd_client *osdc;
rbd_req = kzalloc(sizeof(*rbd_req), GFP_NOIO);
@@ -1165,9 +1164,6 @@ static int rbd_do_request(struct request *rq,
osd_req->r_priv = rbd_req;
- reqhead = osd_req->r_request->front.iov_base;
- reqhead->snapid = cpu_to_le64(CEPH_NOSNAP);
-
strncpy(osd_req->r_oid, object_name, sizeof(osd_req->r_oid));
osd_req->r_oid_len = strlen(osd_req->r_oid);
--
1.7.9.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-03 23:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-03 23:17 [PATCH REPOST 0/5] rbd: drop some unneeded parameters Alex Elder
2013-01-03 23:18 ` [PATCH REPOST 1/5] rbd: drop oid parameters from ceph_osdc_build_request() Alex Elder
2013-01-03 23:18 ` [PATCH REPOST 2/5] rbd: drop snapid parameter from rbd_req_sync_read() Alex Elder
2013-01-03 23:19 ` [PATCH REPOST 3/5] rbd: drop flags parameter from rbd_req_sync_exec() Alex Elder
2013-01-03 23:19 ` [PATCH REPOST 4/5] rbd: kill rbd_req_sync_op() snapc and snapid parameters Alex Elder
2013-01-03 23:19 ` Alex Elder [this message]
2013-01-16 1:46 ` [PATCH REPOST 0/5] rbd: drop some unneeded parameters Josh Durgin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50E61210.6050906@inktank.com \
--to=elder@inktank.com \
--cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.