From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Ujfalusi Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: OMAP4: clock data: ABE DPLL need to be locked on all revisions Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2013 10:59:46 +0100 Message-ID: <50E6A812.40903@ti.com> References: <1357220811-29904-1-git-send-email-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> <1357220811-29904-2-git-send-email-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> <50E5D4EA.5030001@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from bear.ext.ti.com ([192.94.94.41]:47661 "EHLO bear.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752817Ab3ADJ7v (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Jan 2013 04:59:51 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Paul Walmsley Cc: Jon Hunter , Tony Lindgren , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Tero Kristo On 01/04/2013 12:26 AM, Paul Walmsley wrote: > On Thu, 3 Jan 2013, Jon Hunter wrote: >=20 >> I am not sure that this change to the comment is completely accurate= =2E On >> OMAP4430 I did not see any issues with the DPLL failing to turn on i= f >> the DPLL was not locked. I only saw this particular problem on the 4= 460. >> Therefore, it may be better to leave the comment as-is and add an >> additional sentence to state that the DPLL should be locked for all >> OMAP4 devices for audio to work correctly. >=20 > Makes sense to me; what do you think, P=E9ter? OK, I'll resend the series with the proposed comment. --=20 P=E9ter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: peter.ujfalusi@ti.com (Peter Ujfalusi) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2013 10:59:46 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: OMAP4: clock data: ABE DPLL need to be locked on all revisions In-Reply-To: References: <1357220811-29904-1-git-send-email-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> <1357220811-29904-2-git-send-email-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> <50E5D4EA.5030001@ti.com> Message-ID: <50E6A812.40903@ti.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 01/04/2013 12:26 AM, Paul Walmsley wrote: > On Thu, 3 Jan 2013, Jon Hunter wrote: > >> I am not sure that this change to the comment is completely accurate. On >> OMAP4430 I did not see any issues with the DPLL failing to turn on if >> the DPLL was not locked. I only saw this particular problem on the 4460. >> Therefore, it may be better to leave the comment as-is and add an >> additional sentence to state that the DPLL should be locked for all >> OMAP4 devices for audio to work correctly. > > Makes sense to me; what do you think, P?ter? OK, I'll resend the series with the proposed comment. -- P?ter