From: "Stefan Fröberg" <stefan.froberg@petroprogram.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] perf: new package
Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2013 16:01:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50E6E0D0.10302@petroprogram.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130104002214.7a112fdf@skate>
Hi Thomas
4.1.2013 1:22, Thomas Petazzoni kirjoitti:
> Dear Stefan Fr?berg,
>
> On Thu, 03 Jan 2013 17:24:36 +0200, Stefan Fr?berg wrote:
>
>> Here is an elfutils 0.155 (which contains libelf) for buildroot that I
>> posted some time ago.
>> Patch #4 is missing from that list because it was too big to submit to
>> this list.
>>
>> http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/2012-December/063855.html
>> http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/2012-December/063856.html
>> http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/2012-December/063864.html
>> http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/2012-December/063858.html
>> http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/2012-December/063857.html
>> http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/2012-December/063859.html
>> http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/2012-December/063861.html
>> http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/2012-December/063860.html
>> http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/2012-December/063863.html
>> http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/2012-December/063862.html
>> http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/2012-December/063865.html
> I've started having a real look at this, and started refactoring your
> patch series.
>
> Could you point me to the missing PATCH #4, so that I can see your
> entire series? At least send it by private e-mail to me, so that we
> don't get limited by the list.
I can do that but I have to warn you that it's huge (1.5 MB).
Only one of the grub patches in buildroot is bigger (1.6 MB).
It's because uClibc is missing obstack_printf functionality and almost
half of it goes
to implementing it by gnulib portability library
(https://www.gnu.org/software/gnulib/)
Another half goes to enabling fts interface (because it's not enabled by
default in buildroot).
Ofcourse enabling it buy default in buildroot or even better, giving
user a choice of enabling it
in buildroot will help cutting size of that patch.
Anyway, I try to send it to you privately.
And also within few hours I will be kicking my old
crappy server online again, upload that patch there and submit link to
that patch for
everybody to work on.
Regards
Stefan
> Thanks,
>
> Thomas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-04 14:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-03 15:07 [Buildroot] [PATCH] perf: new package Thomas Petazzoni
2013-01-03 15:24 ` Stefan Fröberg
2013-01-03 15:48 ` Stefan Fröberg
2013-01-03 23:22 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-01-04 14:01 ` Stefan Fröberg [this message]
2013-01-04 14:25 ` Stefan Fröberg
2013-01-04 14:27 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-01-04 6:05 ` Kaiwan Billimoria
2013-01-04 8:22 ` Thomas Petazzoni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50E6E0D0.10302@petroprogram.com \
--to=stefan.froberg@petroprogram.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.