All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/5] KVM: x86: clean up reexecute_instruction
Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2013 15:20:24 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50E7D438.60709@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130104222135.GA13481@amt.cnet>

On 01/05/2013 06:21 AM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 09:55:40PM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
>> Little cleanup for reexecute_instruction, also use gpa_to_gfn in
>> retry_instruction
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> ---
>>  arch/x86/kvm/x86.c |   13 ++++++-------
>>  1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>> index 1c9c834..ad39018 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>> @@ -4761,19 +4761,18 @@ static bool reexecute_instruction(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t gva)
>>  	if (tdp_enabled)
>>  		return false;
>>
>> +	gpa = kvm_mmu_gva_to_gpa_read(vcpu, gva, NULL);
>> +	if (gpa == UNMAPPED_GVA)
>> +		return true; /* let cpu generate fault */
>> +
> 
> Why change from _system to _read here? Purely cleanup patch should
> have no logical changes.

Ouch, my mistake, will drop this change.

> 
> BTW, there is not much logic in using reexecute_instruction() at
> for x86_decode_insn (checks in reexecute_instruction() assume 
> write to the cr2, for instance).
> Fault propagation for x86_decode_insn seems completly broken
> (which is perhaps why reexecute_instruction() there survived).

Currently, reexecute_instruction can work only if it is called on page
fault path where cr2 is valid. On other paths, cr2 is 0 which is always
not be mapped on guest since it is NULL pointer, so reexecute_instruction
always retry the instruction.

Yes, as you point it out, it is better if the fault address can be got
from x86_decode_insn. I will consider it later.



  reply	other threads:[~2013-01-05  7:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-01-04 13:53 [PATCH v4 0/5] KVM: x86: improve reexecute_instruction Xiao Guangrong
2013-01-04 13:54 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] KVM: MMU: fix Dirty bit missed if CR0.WP = 0 Xiao Guangrong
2013-01-04 13:54 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] KVM: MMU: fix infinite fault access retry Xiao Guangrong
2013-01-04 13:55 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] KVM: x86: clean up reexecute_instruction Xiao Guangrong
2013-01-04 22:21   ` Marcelo Tosatti
2013-01-05  7:20     ` Xiao Guangrong [this message]
2013-01-04 13:56 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] KVM: x86: let reexecute_instruction work for tdp Xiao Guangrong
2013-01-04 13:56 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] KVM: x86: improve reexecute_instruction Xiao Guangrong
2013-01-04 22:44   ` Marcelo Tosatti
2013-01-05  8:16     ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-01-07 20:46       ` Marcelo Tosatti

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50E7D438.60709@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=gleb@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.