From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-ea0-f182.google.com ([209.85.215.182]:39428 "EHLO mail-ea0-f182.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754609Ab3AEMtR (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Jan 2013 07:49:17 -0500 Received: by mail-ea0-f182.google.com with SMTP id a14so7278335eaa.41 for ; Sat, 05 Jan 2013 04:49:15 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <50E82165.1000100@googlemail.com> Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2013 13:49:41 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Frank_Sch=E4fer?= MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Devin Heitmueller CC: Ezequiel Garcia , Linux Media Mailing List , Hans Verkuil Subject: Re: [GIT PULL FOR 3.9] em28xx videobuf2 support and v4l2-compliance fixes References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: First of all: Hans, Devin thank you for working on this stuff ! Am 04.01.2013 21:59, schrieb Devin Heitmueller: > On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 2:59 PM, Ezequiel Garcia wrote: >> Maybe I'm wrong, but weren't **all** changes supposed to be sent as a PATCH >> to the mailing list for community review, before the PULL request was sent? > No, you are correct. I did a PULL specifically because Mauro asked me > to. Interesting. Can you shed some light on whats going on behind the scenes ? ;) How does this "request for pull-request" thing work and shouldn't this happen on the public ML, too ? > I'll resend the individual patches now to the list. Do you still want me to review/test it ? I'm willing to invest some time for it, but as there is already a pull request, it seems to be ready and I really don't want to waste my time... !? Regards, Frank > Devin >