From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:43567) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TruVT-00047V-6L for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 06 Jan 2013 12:59:38 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TruVR-0002NJ-Q9 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 06 Jan 2013 12:59:35 -0500 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:54426 helo=mx2.suse.de) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TruVR-0002Dm-Jy for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 06 Jan 2013 12:59:33 -0500 Message-ID: <50E9BB57.3060605@suse.de> Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2013 18:58:47 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBGw6RyYmVy?= MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <87ehi3qwzm.fsf@codemonkey.ws> <50E7434E.5000305@suse.de> <871ue0s51j.fsf@codemonkey.ws> In-Reply-To: <871ue0s51j.fsf@codemonkey.ws> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [FYI] Testing new patch management scripts... List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Anthony Liguori Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Am 05.01.2013 04:05, schrieb Anthony Liguori: > Andreas F=C3=A4rber writes: >> Am 02.01.2013 19:07, schrieb Anthony Liguori: >>> 2) Patches that no longer apply via git am --3way will receive a >>> notification. >> >> Isn't Nacked-by too strong of a notification for a mere technical need >> for a rebase (compared to a rejection of its concept/approach)? >=20 > Yeah, I need some sort of tag though for tracking purposes.. Maybe > Rejected-by... Sorry, forgot to mention: I wanted to propose Bounced-by. >> Also, since quite a few of such messages have been appearing on the li= st >> already, might it make sense to shorten the message and rather link to >> some qemu.org Wiki page to spare subscribers' mailboxes? >=20 > I'm focusing at the moment on getting the code in shape to release. We > can tweak the text bits over time. Patches will only send one mail > per-thread so it's unlikely that it will ever cause a space problem eve= n > in the stingiest of corporate mailbox quotas :-) We shouldn't forgot non-corporate mailboxes since QEMU is a community project. :-) I was rather thinking about disk space long-term though and these messages mostly reaching core community members so far that don't need detailed explaining. Andreas --=20 SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N=C3=BCrnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imend=C3=B6rffer; HRB 16746 AG N=C3=BC= rnberg