All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Frank Schäfer" <fschaefer.oss@googlemail.com>
To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
Cc: Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: BUG: bttv does not load module ir-kbd-i2c for Hauppauge model 37284, rev B421
Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2013 21:36:45 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50E9E05D.9090403@googlemail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130105135734.237068c5@redhat.com>

Am 05.01.2013 16:57, schrieb Mauro Carvalho Chehab:
> Em Sat, 05 Jan 2013 15:00:18 +0100
> Frank Schäfer <fschaefer.oss@googlemail.com> escreveu:
>
>> While we are at it ;) :
>>
>> [   15.280772] bttv: Bt8xx card found (0)
>> [   15.281349] bttv: 0: Bt878 (rev 17) at 0000:01:08.0, irq: 18,
>> latency: 32, mmio: 0xfdfff000
>> [   15.281386] bttv: 0: detected: Hauppauge WinTV [card=10], PCI
>> subsystem ID is 0070:13eb
>> [   15.281391] bttv: 0: using: Hauppauge (bt878) [card=10,insmod option]
>> [   15.283964] bttv: 0: Hauppauge/Voodoo msp34xx: reset line init [5]
>> [   15.316043] tveeprom 4-0050: Hauppauge model 37284, rev B421, serial#
>> 5111944
>> [   15.316049] tveeprom 4-0050: tuner model is Philips FM1216 (idx 21,
>> type 5)
>> [   15.316054] tveeprom 4-0050: TV standards PAL(B/G) (eeprom 0x04)
>> [   15.316059] tveeprom 4-0050: audio processor is MSP3410D (idx 5)
>> [   15.316063] tveeprom 4-0050: has radio
>> [   15.316066] bttv: 0: Hauppauge eeprom indicates model#37284
>> [   15.316071] bttv: 0: tuner type=5
>> [   16.178816] bttv: 0: registered device video0
>> [   16.179071] bttv: 0: registered device vbi0
>> [   16.180587] bttv: 0: registered device radio0
>>
>> When I load module ir-kbd-i2c manually:
>>
>> Registered IR keymap rc-hauppauge
>> input: i2c IR (Hauppauge) as /devices/virtual/rc/rc0/input6
>> rc0: i2c IR (Hauppauge) as /devices/virtual/rc/rc0
>> ir-kbd-i2c: i2c IR (Hauppauge) detected at i2c-4/4-0018/ir0 [bt878 #0 [sw]]
>>
>> Remote control works fine then.
> Yeah, this is a known misfeature of bttv, and very likely documented on
> several wiki pages like those:
> 	http://linuxtv.org/wiki/index.php/Remote_controllers-V4L
> (btw, this wiki page is very likely outdated)
> 	http://www.mythtv.org/wiki/Ir-kbd-i2c
> 	http://www.linuxtv.org/wiki/index.php/Prolink_Pixelview_PlayTV_Pro
>
> I can't remember if this were always this way, or if this was
> caused by the I2C core redesign (2006?). I think it was always like that,
> and, as I2C comes with a cost (polling can affect video processing with
> old machines), so, we decided to not do the auto-load on the older
> drivers that weren't doing it already.

I'm not sure I understand you. Is it a misfeature or intentional ?
Does polling 3 bytes every 100ms really affect the performance of video
processing in a perceptable manner ?

> Btw, the fact that there's no clear indication about what bttv boards
> require I2C made hard to remove the get_key codes from ir-kbd-i2c.

See my previous post, I thought the intention is to do the opposite.

> It probably makes sense to add a "has_ir_i2c" field at bttv, add a flag
> there at modprobe to prevent the autoload, and start tagging the boards
> with I2C IR with such tag.

Without having looked into the code, it seems that the driver detects
the i2c rc already without a board flag.
Otherwise it wouldn't register the i2c device. Unfortunately, it doesn't
display a message.

> If you care enough, feel free to send us such patch.

I care enough, but it has a low priority for me at the moment.

Regards,
Frank

> Cheers,
> Mauro


  reply	other threads:[~2013-01-06 20:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-01-05 14:00 BUG: bttv does not load module ir-kbd-i2c for Hauppauge model 37284, rev B421 Frank Schäfer
2013-01-05 15:57 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2013-01-06 20:36   ` Frank Schäfer [this message]
2013-01-07 16:29     ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2013-01-08 17:46       ` Frank Schäfer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50E9E05D.9090403@googlemail.com \
    --to=fschaefer.oss@googlemail.com \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mchehab@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.