All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Cristian Rodríguez" <crrodriguez@opensuse.org>
To: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lib/ext2fs: Use __builtin_popcount when available Signed-off-by: Cristian Rodríguez <crrodriguez@opensuse.org>
Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2013 22:46:34 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50EA28FA.8040205@opensuse.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130107013156.GB12838@thunk.org>

El dom 06 ene 2013 22:31:56 CLST, Theodore Ts'o escribió:
> On Sun, Jan 06, 2013 at 09:53:47PM -0300, Cristian Rodríguez wrote:
>>
>> Yeah, I asked GCC developers exactly this, was told to fill a
>> enhancement request.
>
> If you could also sned them a bug/enhancement request to use a more
> optimized version of __popcountdi2, that would be great.  I'm not sure
> it helps e2fsprogs much, since it's too hard for us to tell whether we
> are using a version of the gcc runtime that has a optimized or
> unuptomized version of builtin_popcount().
>
> But since it doesn't make that much difference, my preference is to
> just ignore builtin_popcount() for now.  If someone is really using
> 128TB ext4 file systems, and cares about that extra 6 seconds of CPU,
> it's probably going to require the ugly approach of using x86 asm
> statements to determine whether or not we're running on a CPU that
> supports the popcount instruction or not....

with a recent compiler it goes something like this..

unsigned int popcnt(unsigned int w) __attribute__ ((ifunc 
("resolve_popcnt")));

__attribute__ ((__target__ ("popcnt")))
static unsigned int hw_popcnt(unsigned int w)
{
    return __builtin_popcount(w);
}

static unsigned int soft_popcnt(unsigned int w)
{
    return __builtin_popcount(w);
}

static void (*resolve_popcnt (void)) (void)
{
#if (__GNUC__ > 4) || (__GNUC__ == 4 && __GNUC_MINOR__ >= 8)
    __builtin_cpu_init();
    if (__builtin_cpu_supports("popcnt"))
        return hw_popcnt;
#else
    unsigned int eax, ebx, ecx, edx;
    if (__get_cpuid (1, &eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx))
        if (ecx & bit_POPCNT)
            return hw_popcnt;
#endif
    /* If magic does not work, or running old cpu.. */
        return soft_popcnt;
}

then call "popcnt" function in the code, this flies in x86 && ELF && 
GCC >= 4.6 only though.
The CPU detection code only runs once at load time btw.



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  reply	other threads:[~2013-01-07  1:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-01-06 15:04 [PATCH] lib/ext2fs: Use __builtin_popcount when available Signed-off-by: Cristian Rodríguez <crrodriguez@opensuse.org> Cristian Rodríguez
2013-01-06 22:20 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-01-07  0:53   ` Cristian Rodríguez
2013-01-07  1:31     ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-01-07  1:46       ` Cristian Rodríguez [this message]
2013-01-07  1:56         ` Theodore Ts'o

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50EA28FA.8040205@opensuse.org \
    --to=crrodriguez@opensuse.org \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.