From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail1.windriver.com ([147.11.146.13]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Ts3HA-0003j9-Dt for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 07 Jan 2013 04:21:31 +0100 Received: from ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-hca.corp.ad.wrs.com [147.11.189.40]) by mail1.windriver.com (8.14.5/8.14.3) with ESMTP id r0736C1r010333 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Sun, 6 Jan 2013 19:06:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from [128.224.163.154] (128.224.163.154) by ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (147.11.189.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.318.4; Sun, 6 Jan 2013 19:06:11 -0800 Message-ID: <50EA3BB5.7080103@windriver.com> Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2013 11:06:29 +0800 From: ChenQi User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Otavio Salvador References: In-Reply-To: X-Originating-IP: [128.224.163.154] Cc: Zhenfeng.Zhao@windriver.com, Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 6/6] core-image-sato: support read-only rootfs X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2013 03:21:37 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 01/07/2013 03:05 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote: > On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 7:44 AM, wrote: >> From: Chen Qi >> >> Support read-only rootfs by providing a specific conf file for volatile storage. >> >> [YOCTO #3406] >> >> Signed-off-by: Chen Qi > I prefer this solution than the previous one however why you don't use > a sato-volatile-conf package to provide this? Because the there exists a one-to-one (or almost one-to-one) correspondence between the volatile conf file and the specific image. If there is a 'sato-volatile-conf' package, then there should be a 'minimal-volatile-conf', and maybe a 'custom-volatile-conf' if users are using a customized image. So I think it's simpler to let the image recipe provide the conf file. The only thing we have to do, when adding read-only rootfs support to some image, is to add the conf file to SRC_URI and install it in choose_volatile_conf. Kind Regards, Chen Qi > > -- > Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems > E-mail: otavio@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br > Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br > >