From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: kishon Subject: Re: usb: multi phy support Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2013 18:02:06 +0530 Message-ID: <50EAC046.2020405@ti.com> References: <20130107120040.GD11232@arwen.pp.htv.fi> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20130107120040.GD11232-S8G//mZuvNWo5Im9Ml3/Zg@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-usb-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: balbi-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org Cc: "Mohammed, Afzal" , "linux-usb-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , "linux-omap-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , "Nori, Sekhar" List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Monday 07 January 2013 05:30 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 12:57:15PM +0100, Mohammed, Afzal wrote: >> AM335x SoC's used in boards like beagle bone has two instances of USB >> modules (2.0) at the hardware level, each having a dedicated phy. >> Currently in mainline, only one instance of USB is supported >> (including a fix in your latest pull request). To support multi >> instance, the biggest obstacle is lack of multi phy support for >> usb phy's of same type. >> >> Earlier Kishon was working on usb phy device tree support, later it was >> seen that generic phy layer was preferred. And Kishon posted a couple of >> versions on generic phy framework, latest being on 26th September 2012, >> but I could not see follow up's on that series. >> >> It seems Kishon is not now working on generic phy support. Let me know >> your opinion/suggestions on supporting usb phy's of same type. We are >> trying to get multi USB instance support in mainline for AM335x. > > Kishon is still working on generic PHY layer indeed. Right Kishon ? Yes. I'll try and send it ASAP. Thanks Kishon -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html