[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 2/6] mx28evk: We shouldn't hardcode a rootfs filesystem type

[Tom Rini <trini@ti.com>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 01/07/2013 07:05 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 2:50 PM, Stefano Babic <sbabic@denx.de> 
> wrote:
>> On 28/12/2012 20:17, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>>> For a generic environment, we shouldn't have a fixed rootfs 
>>> filesystem so we drop it from env.
>>> 
>>> Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br> ---
>> 
>> Hi Otavio,
>> 
>>> Changes in v2: - reformat environment change to fit in 80 cols
>>> 
>>> include/configs/mx28evk.h |    8 +++----- 1 file changed, 3 
>>> insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>> 
>>> diff --git a/include/configs/mx28evk.h 
>>> b/include/configs/mx28evk.h index 8b89b25..ac9522f 100644 --- 
>>> a/include/configs/mx28evk.h +++ b/include/configs/mx28evk.h @@ 
>>> -292,11 +292,9 @@ "console_mainline=ttyAMA0\0" \ "mmcdev=0\0" \
>>> "mmcpart=2\0" \ -     "mmcroot=/dev/mmcblk0p3 rw\0" \ - 
>>> "mmcrootfstype=ext3 rootwait\0" \ -     "mmcargs=setenv 
>>> bootargs console=${console_mainline},${baudrate} " \ - 
>>> "root=${mmcroot} " \ - "rootfstype=${mmcrootfstype}\0" \ +
>>> "mmcroot=/dev/mmcblk0p3 rw rootwait\0" \ +     "mmcargs=setenv
>>> bootargs console=${console_mainline},${baudrate} " + 
>>> "root=${mmcroot}\0" \ "loadbootscript="  \ "fatload mmc 
>>> ${mmcdev}:${mmcpart} ${loadaddr} ${script};\0" \ 
>>> "bootscript=echo Running bootscript from mmc ...; "     \
>>> 
>> 
>> I still get errors running checkpatch, for example:
>> 
>> WARNING: line over 80 characters #554: FILE: 
>> include/configs/mx53loco.h:162: +                       "if run 
>> ${get_cmd} ${ftd_addr} ${ftd_file}; then "      \
>> 
>> WARNING: line over 80 characters #560: FILE: 
>> include/configs/mx53loco.h:168: + "echo ERROR: Cannot load the
>> DT, aborting...; " \
>> 
>> WARNING: line over 80 characters #617: FILE: 
>> include/configs/mx6qsabrelite.h:177: +                       "if 
>> fatload mmc ${mmcdev}:${mmcpart} ${ftd_addr} ${ftd_file}; then " 
>> \
>> 
>> Can you fix it and resubmit, please ? I will then apply the 
>> patchset.
> 
> It does seem too ugly to keep splitting those lines.
> 
> The problem here is the use of tags to indent the string.
> 
> I'd like to ask if we can relax this rule for the environments as 
> it will make it confusing to read when looking at the code for no 
> profit (in my point of  view).

Replied in 5/6, where the issues are popping up from.

- -- 
Tom
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/
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=yO3w
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----