Re: [PATCH V6 6/6] core-image-sato: support read-only rootfs

[ChenQi <Qi.Chen@windriver.com>]

On 01/07/2013 06:30 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 1:06 AM, ChenQi <Qi.Chen@windriver.com> wrote:
>> On 01/07/2013 03:05 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>>> On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 7:44 AM,  <Qi.Chen@windriver.com> wrote:
>>>> From: Chen Qi <Qi.Chen@windriver.com>
>>>>
>>>> Support read-only rootfs by providing a specific conf file for volatile
>>>> storage.
>>>>
>>>> [YOCTO #3406]
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Chen Qi <Qi.Chen@windriver.com>
>>> I prefer this solution than the previous one however why you don't use
>>> a sato-volatile-conf package to provide this?
>> Because the there exists a one-to-one (or almost one-to-one) correspondence
>> between the volatile conf file and the specific image.
>>
>> If there is a 'sato-volatile-conf' package, then there should be a
>> 'minimal-volatile-conf', and maybe a 'custom-volatile-conf' if users are
>> using a customized image.
>>
>> So I think it's simpler to let the image recipe provide the conf file.
>> The only thing we have to do, when adding read-only rootfs support to some
>> image, is to add the conf file to SRC_URI and install it in
>> choose_volatile_conf.
> The problem of not using a package for it is regarding upgrades; it is
> not possible to upgrade the configuration file using the package
> manager. I know most systems using the read-only-fs will be small and
> do not use a package manager at all but some use cases will do (mine,
> in case).
Sounds reasonable.
I'll think about it :)

Thanks,
Chen Qi

> So I do believe we ought to have a one-to-one correspondence here.
>
> --
> Otavio Salvador                             O.S. Systems
> E-mail: otavio@ossystems.com.br  http://www.ossystems.com.br
> Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854              http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
>
>