From: Einar Lueck <elelueck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, ubacher@de.ibm.com,
raspl@de.ibm.com, frankbla@de.ibm.com, samudrala@us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH V2] tcp: introduce raw access to experimental options
Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2013 15:36:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50EC2EF3.5080506@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1357577051.6919.3171.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
On 01/07/2013 05:44 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
> Thats a big addition, and for example doesn't help if the SYNACK should
> include an option that is depending on the content of SYN message.
>
> For TCP fastopen for example, the cookie we send to the client is not a
> constant cookie.
>
> Also TCP coalescing of TCP collapse will merge several skbs, so storing
> "the last received options" in the socket is kind of not well defined
> semantic.
>
> It looks like you need to add hooks and kernel modules to fully use
> experimental options, like congestion control modules.
>
>
Thanks for the fast feedback, Eric. Let me try to make sure that I
understand your suggestions correctly:
You suggest to have a set of hooks that allow to move all code that
exploits experimental options into dedicated modules (e.g. one module
for TCP fastopen and one for cookies). Extensibility then comes on
a per module granularity. Is my understanding correct?
Thx,
Einar.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-08 14:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-07 16:13 [RFC PATCH V2] tcp: introduce raw access to experimental options elelueck
2013-01-07 16:13 ` elelueck
2013-01-07 16:44 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-01-08 14:36 ` Einar Lueck [this message]
2013-01-08 22:30 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50EC2EF3.5080506@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=elelueck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=frankbla@de.ibm.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=raspl@de.ibm.com \
--cc=samudrala@us.ibm.com \
--cc=ubacher@de.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.