From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hannes Reinecke Subject: Re: [multipath tools] pgp->priority average calculation Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2013 08:35:44 +0100 Message-ID: <50ED1DD0.9090900@suse.de> References: <50ECA2F3.7070501@cs.wisc.edu> Reply-To: device-mapper development Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <50ECA2F3.7070501@cs.wisc.edu> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com To: Mike Christie Cc: device-mapper development , christophe.varoqui@gmail.com List-Id: dm-devel.ids On 01/08/2013 11:51 PM, Mike Christie wrote: > Hey Ben and Hannes and Christophe, > > Happy multipath-tools patch submission day :) > > I had a question on the pgp->priority average calculation and its > display to the user. > > > Ben, you added the patch > > commit cd21bd290a57eed350d564bac403da9d6941a144 > Author: Benjamin Marzinski > Date: Wed Nov 10 12:52:20 2010 -0600 > > multipath: sort all pathgroups by priority > > > which did > > @@ -25,14 +25,17 @@ path_group_prio_update (struct pathgroup * pgp) > pgp->enabled_paths++; > } > } > - pgp->priority =3D priority; > + if (pgp->enabled_paths) > + pgp->priority =3D priority / pgp->enabled_paths; > + else > + > > and > > @@ -387,9 +386,7 @@ snprint_pg_pri (char * buff, size_t len, struct > pathgroup * > * Printing is another reason to update. > */ > path_group_prio_update(pgp); > - if (pgp->enabled_paths) > - avg_priority =3D pgp->priority / pgp->enabled_paths; > - return snprint_int(buff, len, avg_priority); > + > > > but then Hannes later added the patch: > > > commit 750db1f0dc08bf1d96ce64d32786dfe07b8ae3f9 > Author: Hannes Reinecke > Date: Wed Mar 17 08:32:51 2010 +0100 > > Display avg priority as group priority > > > which added it back in the print code: > > > - return snprint_int(buff, len, pgp->priority); > + if (pgp->enabled_paths) > + avg_priority =3D pgp->priority / pgp->enabled_paths; > + return snprint_int(buff, len, avg_priority); > > > So when we print the prio, it ends up getting divided by the number of > enabled paths twice. > > > Was Hannes's patch a mistake? Should it be reverted? > Yeah, that seems to be an error. Please revert. Cheers, Hannes -- = Dr. Hannes Reinecke zSeries & Storage hare@suse.de +49 911 74053 688 SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N=FCrnberg GF: J. Hawn, J. Guild, F. Imend=F6rffer, HRB 16746 (AG N=FCrnberg)