From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Henningsson Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "ALSA: hda - Shut up pins at power-saving mode with Conexnat codecs" Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2013 09:36:24 +0100 Message-ID: <50ED2C08.8070209@canonical.com> References: <1355906687-2881-1-git-send-email-david.henningsson@canonical.com> <50D19846.8060902@canonical.com> <50E5ABFF.8040207@canonical.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from youngberry.canonical.com (youngberry.canonical.com [91.189.89.112]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C4C226086E for ; Wed, 9 Jan 2013 09:36:26 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Takashi Iwai Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, 886975@bugs.launchpad.net List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On 01/04/2013 09:49 AM, Takashi Iwai wrote: > At Thu, 03 Jan 2013 17:04:15 +0100, > David Henningsson wrote: >> >> On 12/19/2012 11:38 AM, Takashi Iwai wrote: >>> At Wed, 19 Dec 2012 11:34:46 +0100, >>> David Henningsson wrote: >>>> >>>> On 12/19/2012 11:24 AM, Takashi Iwai wrote: >>>>> At Wed, 19 Dec 2012 09:44:47 +0100, >>>>> David Henningsson wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> This reverts commit 697c373e34613609cb5450f98b91fefb6e910588. >>>>>> >>>>>> The original patch was meant to remove clicking, but in fact caused even >>>>>> more clicking instead. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks to c4pp4 for doing most of the work with this bug. >>>>>> >>>>>> BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/886975 >>>>>> Signed-off-by: David Henningsson >>>>>> --- >>>>>> >>>>>> @c4pp4: Is this consistent with what you have done to reduce the clicking? >>>>>> Will you recommend upstream Linux to take the patch below? >>>>> >>>>> So, it shouldn't be merged yet right now? >>>>> Now is the last chance for merging it to 3.8-rc1. >>>> >>>> If we don't have time waiting for c4pp4's confirmation without missing >>>> the entire 3.8 cycle, then I think we should merge it. >>> >>> It's no new feature, so it's fine to merge it at any time during 3.8 >>> cycle, even after 3.8-rc1. >>> >>> But such a fix should be merged with Cc to stable, so a bit more tests >>> would be better. >> >> Do you have a suggestion on how that should be tested? I have no >> conexant machines here currently. > > Well, at best, test 3.8-rc2 with the patch. The content isn't too > intrusive so it should suffice for merge. Alternatively, the tester > can try older kernel with the same patch. > > The point is to confirm that the patch really works. This has now been confirmed by c4pp4. Please commit the patch. -- David Henningsson, Canonical Ltd. https://launchpad.net/~diwic