All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wido den Hollander <wido@widodh.nl>
To: "Lachfeld, Jutta" <jutta.lachfeld@ts.fujitsu.com>
Cc: "ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org" <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Are there significant performance enhancements in 0.56.x to be expected soon or planned in the near future?
Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2013 14:11:59 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50ED6C9F.5030107@widodh.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BED8C7CC7F6E5A4C9001AF4A075FC3B46D927F31C3@ABGEX70E.FSC.NET>

On 01/09/2013 01:51 PM, Lachfeld, Jutta wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> in expectation of better performance, we are just switching from CEPH version 0.48 to 0.56.1
> for comparisons between Hadoop with HDFS and Hadoop with CEPH FS.
>
> We are now wondering whether there are currently any development activities
> concerning further significant performance enhancements,
> or whether further significant performance enhancements are already planned for the near future.
>

Yes, 0.56(.1) has a significant performance increase compared to 0.48

Two blogposts which might be interesting to read:
* http://ceph.com/dev-notes/whats-new-in-the-land-of-osd/
* http://ceph.com/uncategorized/argonaut-vs-bobtail-performance-preview/

I'm not running with HDFS, but I see a good performance increase with 
Virtual Machines running on RBD.

Wido

> I would now be loath to start benchmarking with 0.56.1 and then, a month or so later, detect that there have been significant performance enhancements in CEPH in the meantime.
>
> Regards,
> Jutta.
>
> -
> jutta.lachfeld@ts.fujitsu.com, Fujitsu Technology Solutions PBG PDG ES&S SWE SOL 4, "Infrastructure Solutions", MchD 5B, Tel. ..49-89-3222-2705, Company Details: http://de.ts.fujitsu.com/imprint
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>


  reply	other threads:[~2013-01-09 13:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-01-09 12:51 Are there significant performance enhancements in 0.56.x to be expected soon or planned in the near future? Lachfeld, Jutta
2013-01-09 13:11 ` Wido den Hollander [this message]
2013-01-09 13:30   ` Christopher Kunz
2013-01-09 13:37 ` Dennis Jacobfeuerborn
2013-01-09 16:58   ` Sage Weil
2013-01-09 14:20 ` Mark Kampe
2013-01-09 14:26 ` Mark Nelson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50ED6C9F.5030107@widodh.nl \
    --to=wido@widodh.nl \
    --cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jutta.lachfeld@ts.fujitsu.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.