From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christopher Kunz Subject: Re: Are there significant performance enhancements in 0.56.x to be expected soon or planned in the near future? Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2013 14:30:35 +0100 Message-ID: <50ED70FB.8020902@de-punkt.de> References: <50ED6C9F.5030107@widodh.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-10.de-punkt.de ([93.190.68.161]:48345 "EHLO mail-10.de-punkt.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757846Ab3AINak (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jan 2013 08:30:40 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail-10.de-punkt.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8BDA3A32F for ; Wed, 9 Jan 2013 14:30:37 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-10.de-punkt.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail-10.de-punkt.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w6aUU7fdtOOi for ; Wed, 9 Jan 2013 14:30:37 +0100 (CET) Received: from Christophers-MacBook-Pro.local (p4FFFEC0C.dip.t-dialin.net [79.255.236.12]) (Authenticated sender: chris@de-punkt.de) by mail-10.de-punkt.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 747EB3A32D for ; Wed, 9 Jan 2013 14:30:36 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <50ED6C9F.5030107@widodh.nl> Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: "ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org" Hi, > > Yes, 0.56(.1) has a significant performance increase compared to 0.48 > That is not exactly the OP's question, though. If I understand correctly, she is concerned about ongoing performance improvements within the "bobtail" branch, i.e. between 0.56.1 and 0.56.X (with X>1). Jutta, what kind of use case do you have in mind, i.e. how complex are your benchmarking scenarios? Regards, --ck